Where did you get the " 11 workers" from?The ann. said " a...

Where did you get the " 11 workers" from?
The ann. said " a number of employees and contractors"
I'd imagine that the contractors represented either the
installation contractor or the design/manufacturer of that
section of the plant.

While all accidents are serious and need remedy, had the accident occourred
in the course of normal operations rather than during a scheduled maintenance
session, it would have been more serious for the company.

While the cause of the accident has been stated as " a blocked fibreglass pipe
ruptured in the sodium sulphate crystallisation area of the Plant, during maintenance activities,....", it is not known whether the maintenance activities
caused the blockage and the subsequent rupture OR whether the part of the
maintenance program was to remedy this blockage. If the latter, then
the situation may be more serious and require plant modifications rather
than upgraded maintenance safety proceedures.

The ann so far has not qualified the situation sufficiently for us to make an educated guess at the remedy and consequently the stoppage period. We simply
have to accept the ann. which said " the re-establishment of the area will
likely be resolved during the scheduled outage" ( 3 weeks)

As a shareholder I wish to extend my sympathy to those who were injured and also to their families. Chemical burns can be very painful indeed.

With kind regards
Moorookamick