I am going by what the rep from the IVZ team said directly in the interview. When I noted that here many were surprised and wanted a reference to the interview as if my statement was u true. It wasnt but it was exact.y correct. Now they have it to watch. And Scott in the past hinted at 20% would be agreed upon. To me 60% explains a lot in terms of the constant sell off when added to the cash & dilution issues. I mean all we get is good news while the stock keeps coming down for 6 months or so. That is very odd. And does it ever take 3+ yrs to sign off a "customary" document? And if 60% was so common someone would have asked Scott about that in the past. But in 3 yrs no one has. Scott was saying 2+ yrs ago they were close to signoff. And if the 60% is so common why hasnt Scott even once hinted at this? He NEVER has. So you can bang your chest all you want but we shall see. I would like to see people here comment on what % age they thought was coming. I doubt if people are being honest that 60% would be common. I am sure 20-25% would be by far most common.
IVZ Price at posting:
6.9¢ Sentiment: Hold Disclosure: Held
