- Release Date: 14/04/15 08:30
- Summary: GENERAL: CRP: Notice of Offer of Same Class Financial Products for Issue
- Price Sensitive: No
- Download Document 6.51KB
CRP 14/04/2015 08:30 GENERAL PRICE SENSITIVE REL: 0830 HRS Chatham Rock Phosphate Limited GENERAL: CRP: Notice of Offer of Same Class Financial Products for Issue Notice of Offer of Same Class Financial Products for Issue Chatham Rock Phosphate Limited (Chatham Rock) intends to undertake a pro-rata 1 for 1 renounceable rights offer for new ordinary shares in Chatham Rock (New Shares) to Chatham Rock's eligible shareholders (those on the share register on the record date of 5pm, 10 April 2015) (the Offer). Pursuant to clause 17(1)(a) of Schedule 1 of the Financial Markets Conduct (Phase 1) Regulations 2014 (Regulations) and clause 19 of Schedule 1 of the Financial Markets Conduct Act 2013 (FMCA), Chatham Rock advises that: 1. The Offer is being made in reliance upon the exclusion in clause 19 of Schedule 1 of the FMCA and Chatham Rock is giving this notice (Cleansing Notice) under clause 17(1)(a) of Schedule 1 of the Regulations. 2. As at the date of this Cleansing Notice, Chatham Rock is in compliance with: (a) the continuous disclosure obligations that apply to it in relation to Chatham Rock listed securities; and (b) its "financial reporting obligations" within the meaning set out in clause 17(4) of Schedule 1 of the Regulations. 3. As at the date of this Cleansing Notice, there is no information that is "excluded information" within the meaning set out in clause 17(4) of Schedule 1 of the Regulations, other than: (a) Chatham Rock is currently disputing approximately $605,000 of costs levied against it by the Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) in relation to its recently concluded marine consent application process. At the outset of the application process, a budget for these costs was developed by the EPA. This budget has been exceeded and Chatham Rock's view is that it did not write a blank cheque to the EPA for costs. Chatham Rock is concerned there is a lack of financial discipline when allocating EPA costs to an external party's account. Included in the disputed costs are costs associated with the two EPA staff reports that the EPA prepared. Chatham Rock's view is there was no legislative basis for these reports being prepared and certainly not at Chatham Rock's cost. Chatham Rock is currently undertaking a detailed review of all costs levied by the EPA at a line by line level and requesting supporting information to define the exact quantum at issue. This process is currently stalled, as the EPA is treating requests for supporting information to its costs as a request under the Official Information Act 1982, and is indicating that it might seek to charge Chatham Rock further costs for substantiating its own costs; and (b) Chatham Rock was invoiced $475,000 (including GST) in December 2013 by New Zealand Petroleum and Minerals (NZPAM) for its annual Mining Permit fee for the seven months to 30 June 2014. This fee was paid in full. An unintended consequence of the Mining Permit's governing statutes and regulations is that the formula used to calculate this fee was determined on a permit area basis without reference to the value of the actual resource. As Chatham Rock's Mining Permit relates to a large off-shore area (rather than in a concentrated on-shore area) it resulted in a significantly higher mining fee being charged to Chatham Rock than would be reasonably expected. This was remedied by a change to the relevant laws late last year and the annual fee is now only 10% of that levied previously. The fact the legislation was amended demonstrates the gross unfairness that Chatham Rock was charged such a high fee in the first place. Chatham Rock is in discussions with NZPAM and seeking a 90% refund of the fee paid in respect of the period to 30 June 2014. There is no guarantee that Chatham Rock will receive a partial refund of this fee; however, Chatham Rock is considering all available options to obtain a partial refund. 4. The potential effects that the Offer and the issue of New Shares will have on the "control" (within the meaning of clause 48 of Schedule 1 of the FMCA) of Chatham Rock and the consequences of those effects are as follows: (a) As at the date of this Cleansing Notice, the substantial security holders in Chatham Rock are Subsea Investments II LLC, Boskalis Offshore Subsea Contracting B.V., Wouter van Woudenberg and Aorere Resources Limited. (b) If all eligible shareholders take up their pro-rata entitlements to New Shares under the Offer, their percentage shareholding in Chatham Rock will remain the same and there will be no effect on the control of Chatham Rock (provided that the entitlements of any ineligible shareholders are taken up by parties not having the pre-Offer capacity to exercise "control"). (c) In some cases, shareholders with registered addresses outside of New Zealand and Australia may not be eligible to participate in the Offer (and their percentage shareholding will be diluted as a result of the issue of New Shares), due to the legal requirements of the relevant jurisdiction being unduly onerous for Chatham Rock to make the Offer in that jurisdiction (as provided for in NZAX Listing Rule 7.4.3(h)). However, Chatham Rock does not anticipate that the combined percentage interest of any ineligible shareholders is likely to be sufficiently significant for its dilution to have a material effect on the control of Chatham Rock if all eligible shareholders take up their entitlements. (d) If some eligible shareholders do not take up their full entitlement, such shareholders' percentage shareholding will be reduced (relative to those who did take up their full entitlement), and Chatham Rock will be entitled to allocate that Shortfall to other parties who have taken up their full entitlement under the oversubscription facility. (e) In addition, if there is a Shortfall under the Offer (following any applications for additional New Shares, as described above), Chatham Rock will be entitled to place the Shortfall to any persons (subject to complying with applicable legislative instruments and the NZX Listing Rules) within three (3) months of the Offer closing. (f) Accordingly, the Offer is not expected to have any material effect or consequence on the control of Chatham Rock, if Eligible Shareholders largely take up their Entitlements. Eligible Shareholders who do not take up their Entitlements will, if all Shortfall is allotted, have their percentage shareholding diluted by 50%. A copy of the Offer Document accompanies this announcement. On behalf of the Board, Chris Castle Chief Executive Officer Email: [email protected] End CA:00263042 For:CRP Type:GENERAL Time:2015-04-14 08:30:36
- Forums
- NZX - By Stock
- Ann: GENERAL: CRP: Notice of Offer of Same Class Financial Products for Issue
Ann: GENERAL: CRP: Notice of Offer of Same Class Financial...
Featured News
Add CRP (NZSX) to my watchlist