It would be nice to understand his rational for follow up drilling given the drill holes did not end in mineralization and the mineralization that the drill passed through were narrow intercepts of low grade and if that was supergene does that even accentuate how poor the results were ?
Why would he theorize there is mineralization is deeper down needing RC drilling ?
I am no Geo and he is a distinguished Geo so I am sure his analysis is correct , but would be great to get a more detailed account of his rational for spending more money on Marylebone and maybe an actual comparison in drill samples with Paddington to back up his theory?
Ann: Gidji drilling results indicate potential new gold camp, page-3
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 8 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add M2R (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
0.7¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $1.382M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 0.7¢ | 0.7¢ | 0.7¢ | $5.333K | 761.7K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 7 | 569526 | 0.7¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 0.8¢ | 1149538 | 2 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 14.26pm 28/06/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| M2R (ASX) Chart |