I will reply on your post - not so much for the MDR aspect of it - because that is pretty obvious - if it isn't MDR - it will be someone else in the future.
What you say - I have zero doubt that at some time in the future - will be the norm - except for one thing.
IMO - you can cut out the doctor.
Machines are already diagnosing in the high 90%'s --- CORRECTLY.
Doctors - are also diagnosing --------------- very very incorrectly - if they get in the 70's% - that would be lucky.
In many cases - they get 70% WRONG.
So - why, in the future - would you have a physical human with dismal diagnostic performance - and very very limited knowledge of available medications ---------------- 'checking' - or 'looking' at results - then, writing a script?
I can see the day where we might have very high performing humans on call to interfere IF things are not going as planned - but, by that time - machines will probably be doing it all anyway ----------- but, in the interim - it is possible.
Of course - it won't happen instantly - it will be an 'evolution' - but, with the way AI is going - it will be very quick - withing a couple of decades at the most I suspect.
The way things are now -----
if you go to half a dozen doctors for opinions - on many many issues -- you will come away with half a dozen different opinions --------------- and, you will be lucky if ONE of them is correct.
This is not an open bash of the doctors system ---------- it is an opinion based on my years in the health system and basic observation.
Even recently - over the last few years - I have had friends and family - who have seen one specialist and told they have cancer of whatever - and another specialist who says they do not.
Other cases - 'you have damage to your aorta' by one specialist - and another who says - 'no damage' is in evidence.
That's only 2 examples -- I have many.
And, if you actually fluke the correct diagnosis - then, you often see a nightmare wander through the medication and also surgical circles.
The kill and maim rates are massive.
Once we get to AI diagnosis where the diagnosis correct rate is high 90's - then, all that is left is 'how to treat'.
Surgery and life management is one thing - medication is completely another -
there isn't a doctor alive that knows details about every drug in every class - there are millions and millions of them -------------- but, - a computer can know that - far better than the very best human.
It can also know what is the next best thing to change to if the patient reacts with unwanted side effects - and has a far better chance of managing the problems to do with polypharmacy -
once you get into individuals and polypharmacy - the 'possibilities' are far far far beyond any human brain.
The way of the future is crystal clear --------------- machines - it's only when.
Pinto
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- Ann: GlaxoSmithKline Extends Service Agreement with MedAdvisor-MDR.AX
I will reply on your post - not so much for the MDR aspect of it...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 6 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add MDR (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
46.0¢ |
Change
0.005(1.10%) |
Mkt cap ! $253.6M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
45.5¢ | 46.0¢ | 45.5¢ | $5.16K | 11.23K |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
1 | 10131 | 44.5¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
46.0¢ | 6761 | 1 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
1 | 10131 | 0.445 |
2 | 15252 | 0.435 |
2 | 10878 | 0.430 |
4 | 104839 | 0.425 |
2 | 15735 | 0.420 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.460 | 6761 | 1 |
0.465 | 2632 | 1 |
0.470 | 11104 | 1 |
0.475 | 21444 | 2 |
0.480 | 15857 | 3 |
Last trade - 10.27am 22/08/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
MDR (ASX) Chart |
The Watchlist
SS1
SUN SILVER LIMITED
Gerard O'Donovan, Executive Director
Gerard O'Donovan
Executive Director
SPONSORED BY The Market Online