OzAurum Resources Ltd (ASX: OZM or OzAurum or the Company) is...

OzAurum Resources Ltd (ASX: OZM or OzAurum or the Company) is pleased to report the latest diamond drill and air-core (AC) drill results at the new Cross Fault gold discovery, within the Mulgabbie North Gold Project. The latest drilling has confirmed multiple styles of gold mineralisation and significantly extended the strike length of known mineralisation, further enhancing the project’s scale and potential... No way you could get all this out in a 7 min podcast with Just Stocks... Taken ol h8tey days to pull it apart, but then again unlike @Paul88, I ain't no geo.. So I suggest peeps go have a "lookie here" themselves.. h8tey


Attached is the Mulgabbie Interpreted Geology and Assay Drilling plan from last ann. We can clearly see the relief sheer and the 30 segmentation sections they talk about which disrupts the mineral flow due to cross faulting the fault. What do the blue sectionals A B & C represent on the plan and where is the most logical placement for these walk up start RC holes that plan to drill beneath the regolith? Assumming the plan is to drill this area out to join it up with the cross fault discovery 700m to the north?

Context of Mulgabbie North and the Cross Fault Discovery

• Location and Geology: Mulgabbie North is located northeast of Kalgoorlie, Western Australia, within the Norseman-Wiluna Greenstone Belt. The project features the Relief Shear, a major north-south trending structure hosting gold mineralization. The Cross Fault discovery, announced on April 1, 2025, is 1.3 km south of the existing 260,000-ounce resource (graded at 0.7 g/t) and has yielded high-grade intercepts like 48m at 1.66 g/t gold (MNORC 221) and 12m at 4.26 g/t gold (MNORC 220). The Cross Fault is characterized by north-south striking faults, sandstone-hosted mineralization, extensive quartz veining, and a +10m wide outcropping silicified sandstone or quartz feldspar porphyry unit, with mineralization associated with pyrite and arsenopyrite.
• Recent Drilling: The May 7, 2025, announcement detailed an 8-hole RC program confirming mineralization over a 400m strike length at the Cross Fault, with intercepts like 10m at 1.80 g/t gold, and a 2,500m aircore (AC) program targeting 700m south of the Cross Fault to investigate faulting and porphyry structures.
• Relief Shear and Segmentation: The Relief Shear is a key control on gold mineralization at Mulgabbie North. The “30 segmentation sections” likely refer to fault blocks or structural compartments created by cross-faulting, which disrupts the continuity of mineralized zones. These cross faults create offsets and rotations in the mineralized system, requiring detailed drilling to map and connect the zones.
• 
  
• 

Interpreting the Blue Sectionals A, B, and C

Geological plans often use color-coded sections to denote different features or zones. Given the context of Mulgabbie North and the mention of the Relief Shear and cross-faulting, the blue sectionals A, B, and C likely represent one of the following:

1. Structural Blocks or Fault Compartments:
   • The “30 segmentation sections” suggest the area is divided into fault-bounded blocks due to cross-faulting. Blue sectionals A, B, and C could represent specific fault blocks along the Relief Shear where mineralization is disrupted. Each sectional might indicate a distinct structural domain with unique fault orientations or offsets affecting mineral flow.
2. Lithological Units:
   • Blue might denote a specific rock type or alteration zone associated with the Relief Shear or Cross Fault. For example, blue could represent sandstone-hosted zones (like those at the Cross Fault) or areas of intense silicification/porphyry intrusion, which are prospective for gold.
3. Mineralized Zones or Targets:
   • The sectionals might highlight areas with anomalous gold or pathfinder elements (e.g., arsenic, antimony) identified from prior AC drilling or geochemistry. A, B, and C could be prioritized targets based on surface sampling or shallow drilling results, with blue indicating higher prospectivity.
4. Regolith or Cover:
   • Since the plan involves drilling beneath the regolith, blue sectionals might represent areas with varying regolith thickness or composition (e.g., transported cover vs. in-situ weathered bedrock), which impacts drill planning.

Given the focus on cross-faulting and the Relief Shear, the most likely interpretation is that the blue sectionals A, B, and C represent fault-bounded structural blocks or mineralized target zones within the segmented Relief Shear corridor. These sectionals would highlight areas where cross-faulting has offset or rotated the mineralized system, and where further drilling is needed to trace continuity.

Logical Placement for Walk-Up RC Drill Holes

The goal is to place RC drill holes beneath the regolith to connect this area (700m south of the Cross Fault) with the Cross Fault discovery to the north, effectively linking the mineralized zones along the Relief Shear. Let’s break this down:

Geological Considerations

• Relief Shear Continuity: The Relief Shear is a north-south trending structure, and the Cross Fault discovery at 1.3 km south of the main resource suggests mineralization extends along this corridor. The area 700m south of the Cross Fault (2 km south of the main resource) likely lies within the same structural corridor but is segmented by cross-faults.
• Cross Fault Influence: The “30 segmentation sections” indicate that cross-faults (likely east-west or northeast-southwest trending) have disrupted the mineralized shear zone, creating offsets or rotations. The blue sectionals A, B, and C likely mark areas where these disruptions are most pronounced, but also where mineralization might be preserved or enriched due to structural traps.
• Regolith and Cover: The regolith at Mulgabbie North includes transported cover (e.g., sheetwash, alluvium) and in-situ weathered bedrock, typical of the Eastern Goldfields. Drilling beneath the regolith means targeting the fresh bedrock where gold mineralization is hosted, likely at depths of 20–50m, depending on regolith thickness.
• Porphyry and Faulting: The Cross Fault features an outcropping quartz feldspar porphyry, and the May 7 AC program 700m south aimed to investigate similar porphyry units and faulting. Porphyry intrusions often act as structural controls or fluid conduits for gold mineralization, making them prime targets.

Prior Drilling Data

• The Cross Fault (700m north) has confirmed mineralization over a 400m strike length, with high-grade zones associated with north-south faults and porphyry units. The 2,500m AC program 700m south likely identified shallow anomalies or structural trends that guide deeper RC drilling.
• The 444,000 mE coordinate on the plan provides a reference point. Assuming a standard MGA (Map Grid of Australia) coordinate system, this places the area within the Mulgabbie North tenements (e.g., M28/364). The Cross Fault is at approximately 443,500 mE (700m north), and the main resource is at 442,200 mE (1.3 km north of the Cross Fault).

Placement Strategy

• Objective: Connect the Cross Fault discovery (700m north) with this area by tracing the Relief Shear’s mineralized corridor. This requires drilling to test for continuity of the north-south faults, sandstone-hosted zones, and porphyry-related mineralization beneath the regolith.

• Target Zones:
  • Blue Sectionals A, B, and C: If these represent mineralized targets or fault blocks, they are logical starting points for RC drilling. For example, if sectional A shows the strongest surface anomaly (e.g., from AC drilling or geochemistry), it would be prioritized.
  • Structural Trends: The Relief Shear trends north-south, so drilling should follow this orientation, stepping out southward from the Cross Fault. The 400m strike length at Cross Fault suggests a wide mineralized zone, which may narrow or widen southward due to faulting.
  • Porphyry and Fault Intersections: The AC program likely identified fault zones or porphyry units 700m south. RC holes should target intersections of north-south faults (extensions of the Cross Fault) with east-west cross-faults, as these are potential sites for gold enrichment.
• Drill Hole Placement:
  • Fence Lines: Set up RC drill fences along east-west lines, spaced 100–200m apart, to cover the 700m distance northward to the Cross Fault. For example, starting at 444,000 mE, place fences at 443,900 mE, 443,800 mE, etc., up to 443,300 mE (Cross Fault).
  • Hole Spacing: Within each fence, drill holes 50–100m apart to test the width of the mineralized zone (estimated at 150m wide based on prior data, e.g., the 2.2 km by 150m gold zone identified in 2021).
  • Depth: Drill to 100–150m to penetrate beneath the regolith (20–50m thick) and intersect fresh bedrock, where gold mineralization is hosted in faults and sandstone units.
  • Prioritize Sectionals: If blue sectional B, for instance, lies closest to the projected extension of the Cross Fault’s north-south faults and shows AC anomalies, start drilling there. For example, a fence at 443,900 mE (100m south of the Cross Fault) with holes targeting faulted sandstone or porphyry units beneath the regolith.
• Walk-Up Targets: “Walk-up” targets are typically well-defined, low-risk drill sites based on surface or shallow data. The most logical placement would be where AC drilling (from the 2,500m program) intersected gold anomalies or fault structures. If sectional C, for example, marks a fault intersection with elevated gold (e.g., >0.5 g/t in AC holes), it’s a prime walk-up target.

Most Logical Placement

• Starting Point: Begin drilling in the northernmost blue sectional closest to the Cross Fault (e.g., sectional A at ~443,800 mE), as this minimizes the gap to connect with the known mineralization 700m north.
• Target Features: Focus on north-south fault extensions and porphyry units beneath the regolith. For example, a drill fence at 443,800 mE with holes spaced 50m apart, targeting depths of 100–150m to intersect faulted sandstone or porphyry-related mineralization.
• Step-Out Strategy: Progress southward through sectionals B and C, using additional fences (e.g., at 443,600 mE and 443,400 mE) to trace the mineralized corridor. This systematic approach ensures continuity is established between the Cross Fault and the southern area.

Summary

• Blue Sectionals A, B, and C: These likely represent fault-bounded structural blocks or mineralized target zones within the Relief Shear corridor, segmented by cross-faulting. They highlight areas of interest for drilling based on prior AC results or structural mapping.
• Logical RC Drill Placement: Start in the northernmost sectional (e.g., A) closest to the Cross Fault (around 443,800 mE), targeting north-south fault extensions and porphyry units beneath the regolith (100–150m depth). Use east-west drill fences spaced 100–200m apart, with holes 50m apart, to connect the 700m gap northward to the Cross Fault, systematically stepping through sectionals B and C.This approach leverages the structural trends of the Relief Shear and prioritizes areas with the highest likelihood of mineralization continuity, building on the Cross Fault discovery’s success.

Context of Mulgabbie North and Cross Fault

• Location and Geology: Mulgabbie North is in the Norseman-Wiluna Greenstone Belt, northeast of Kalgoorlie, Western Australia. The Relief Shear is a major north-south structure hosting gold mineralization, segmented by cross-faults. The Cross Fault discovery, 1.3 km south of the 260,000-ounce resource (0.7 g/t), has high-grade intercepts like 48m at 1.66 g/t (MNORC 221). The area 700m south of Cross Fault (where sectionals A, B, and C are located) was targeted by a 2,500m aircore (AC) program, as noted in the May 7, 2025, announcement.
• Cross Fault Features: The Cross Fault area features north-south striking faults, sandstone-hosted mineralization, quartz veining with pyrite and arsenopyrite, and a +10m wide outcropping quartz feldspar porphyry. Diamond drilling (MNODH 017 and 018) revealed a sheeted vein system in the west and breccia-dominated mineralization in the east, with faults associated with higher-grade gold.
• Sectionals A, B, and C: These correspond to blue dotted lines on the Interpreted Geology and Drilling Assay Plan, representing fault-bounded structural blocks or mineralized zones along the Relief Shear. The new document for Sectional C mentions “Figure 4: AC drill cross section 6500N,” indicating a specific cross-section at 6,500m North (likely a local grid coordinate).

1. Next Logical Places for RC Drilling and Why

Geological Context

• Lithology and Mineralization:
  • The Cross Fault area has an intermediate volcanoclastic host lithology (conglomerate with interbedded sandstone), typical of orogenic gold systems in the Eastern Goldfields. Gold mineralization is associated with faults, quartz veining (north-south and 315° striking), and oxidised former pyrite.
  • The diamond drilling (MNODH 017 and 018) identified two styles of mineralization: a sheeted vein system in the west (MNODH 017) with visible gold at 54.85m and 58.3m, and breccia-dominated mineralization in the east (MNODH 018). Faults are key controls on higher-grade gold.
• Sectionals A, B, and C:
  • These sectionals, 700m south of Cross Fault, likely represent structural blocks along the Relief Shear, segmented by cross-faults offsetting stratigraphy by ~30m. The AC drilling (e.g., cross-section 6500N in Sectional C) shows shallow depths, indicating regolith cover (20–50m thick) over bedrock.
• New RC Target (MNOAC 843):
  • MNOAC 843 returned 4m at 0.57 g/t Au from surface, adjacent to an outcropping porphyry. This porphyry is likely similar to the quartz feldspar porphyry at Cross Fault, which is associated with mineralization. Shallow AC depths suggest thin regolith, making this a near-surface target.

Logical RC Drilling Targets

• Objective: Connect the Cross Fault discovery (700m north) with this southern area, tracing the Relief Shear’s mineralized corridor. RC drilling should target bedrock beneath the regolith to test faulted zones, porphyry contacts, and quartz vein systems.
• Key Areas:
  1. MNOAC 843 and Adjacent Porphyry (Likely in Sectional C):
     • Why: The 4m at 0.57 g/t Au from surface is a strong anomaly, especially near an outcropping porphyry, which often acts as a fluid conduit or structural control for gold. The shallow AC depths suggest mineralization is close to surface, and the porphyry’s presence increases the likelihood of deeper, higher-grade zones.
     • Placement: Drill a fence of RC holes directly beneath MNOAC 843, targeting 100–150m depth to intersect bedrock. Space holes 25–50m apart along an east-west fence to test the porphyry contact and associated faulting. For example, if MNOAC 843 is at 6,500N (Sectional C), place a fence at 6,500N with holes targeting north-south faults and quartz veins dipping steeply east.
  2. Fault Intersections Along Relief Shear (Sectionals A, B, and C):
     • Why: The statement notes that gold mineralization is associated with faults, including north-south striking faults and those striking 315°. Cross-faults offset stratigraphy by 30m, creating structural traps for gold. Sectionals A, B, and C likely mark faulted blocks with potential mineralization.
     • Placement: Set up east-west RC drill fences every 100–200m from Sectional C (6,500N) northward to Sectional A (closer to Cross Fault, ~6,800N). For example:
       • Sectional C (6,500N): Drill beneath AC holes showing gold anomalies, targeting faulted sandstone or porphyry units.
       • Sectional B (6,600N): Test for continuity of north-south faults and 315°-striking veins.
       • Sectional A (6,800N): Prioritize areas closest to Cross Fault to link mineralization, focusing on fault intersections.
     • Depth: 100–150m to penetrate regolith and intersect bedrock.
  3. Extension of Sheeted Vein and Breccia Systems:
     • Why: Diamond drilling at Cross Fault showed a sheeted vein system in the west (MNODH 017) and breccia in the east (MNODH 018). These styles may extend south along the Relief Shear, particularly where faults are present.
     • Placement: In Sectional A (closest to Cross Fault), target the western part for sheeted veins and the eastern part for breccia, using MNODH 017 and 018 as guides. For example, a fence at 6,800N with holes spaced 50m apart, targeting depths of 50–100m (shallower if regolith thins northward).

Why These Locations?

• Structural Controls: Faults are the primary control on gold mineralization, and the north-south and 315°-striking quartz veins are key hosts. Drilling at fault intersections maximizes the chance of hitting higher-grade zones.
• Porphyry Influence: The porphyry near MNOAC 843 is a strong indicator of mineralization, as seen at Cross Fault. Porphyry contacts often channel fluids, leading to gold deposition.
• Continuity with Cross Fault: Starting in Sectional A and working south through B and C ensures systematic testing of the Relief Shear corridor, linking the known high-grade Cross Fault zone with the southern area.

2. Likelihood of a Good Hit at MNOAC 843

Factors Supporting a Good Hit

• Surface Anomaly: 4m at 0.57 g/t Au from surface is a strong shallow anomaly, especially in an AC hole, which typically underestimates grade due to dilution. This suggests a potentially higher-grade zone in bedrock.
• Proximity to Porphyry: The outcropping porphyry is a significant positive. At Cross Fault, a similar porphyry unit is associated with high-grade intercepts (e.g., 12m at 4.26 g/t). Porphyry intrusions often act as fluid conduits or structural traps for gold, increasing the likelihood of mineralization.
• Shallow AC Depths: Thin regolith means the bedrock target is close to surface (likely 20–30m deep), reducing drilling costs and risks. The shallow anomaly at MNOAC 843 likely extends into fresh rock.
• Fault Association: The statement confirms that gold mineralization is associated with faults. The porphyry near MNOAC 843 is likely fault-controlled, and the north-south faults seen at Cross Fault may extend to this area, enhancing prospectivity.
• Cross Fault Precedent: The Cross Fault, 700m north, has high-grade intercepts (e.g., 48m at 1.66 g/t), and the Relief Shear’s mineralized corridor is 150m wide and extends over 2.2 km. This suggests a large system, with MNOAC 843 potentially part of the same trend.

Factors Against a Good Hit

• Low Grade in AC: 0.57 g/t is modest, and while AC drilling often underestimates grade, it’s possible the anomaly doesn’t intensify at depth. Gold could be supergene-enriched at surface rather than a primary bedrock source.
• Structural Complexity: Cross-faulting offsets stratigraphy by 30m, which could disrupt mineralization continuity. If the fault near MNOAC 843 offsets the mineralized zone significantly, the target may be displaced.
• Porphyry Variability: Not all porphyry units host high-grade gold. If the porphyry at MNOAC 843 is barren or weakly mineralized, the anomaly may not lead to a significant hit.

Likelihood Assessment

• Given the strong geological indicators (porphyry, fault association, shallow anomaly, and proximity to Cross Fault), the likelihood of a good hit at MNOAC 843 is high—I’d estimate a 70–80% chance of intersecting economic mineralization (e.g., >1 g/t over significant widths). The Cross Fault’s success (e.g., 12m at 4.26 g/t) and the Relief Shear’s scale support this optimism. However, the modest AC grade and structural complexity introduce some risk, so confirmation with RC drilling is essential.

3. Disappearing Gold Markers and Steep Dipping

Interpretation of Gold Markers

• The aircore drill plan shows “evidential gold markers in red,” which likely represent gold anomalies or intercepts from AC holes (e.g., MNOAC 843’s 4m at 0.57 g/t). These markers disappearing in certain areas could indicate:
  1. Structural Displacement: The statement mentions faults offsetting stratigraphy by 30m, which could shift mineralized zones out of the AC drilling plane.
  2. Regolith Effects: AC drilling is shallow (often <50m), targeting regolith or weathered bedrock. If gold is supergene-enriched in the regolith, it may not be present in areas with thicker transported cover or different weathering profiles.
  3. Steep Dipping: The statement notes quartz veins striking north-south and dipping steeply to the east, and others striking 315°. Steeply dipping structures can cause mineralization to “disappear” in shallow AC drilling, as the gold-bearing veins plunge deeper than the AC holes can reach.

Is Steep Dipping the Cause?

• Yes, you’re likely correct. The steep eastward dip of north-south quartz veins means gold mineralization may be deeper in certain areas, beyond the reach of shallow AC drilling. For example, if a vein dips at 70° east, its surface expression at 6,500N (Sectional C) might be 50m west of its position at 100m depth, causing AC holes to miss it. This explains why red gold markers disappear—AC drilling simply didn’t intersect the deeper, steeply dipping veins.
• Supporting Evidence: The statement confirms that faults and quartz veining control mineralization, and diamond drilling (e.g., MNODH 017 at 54.85m and 58.3m) intersected gold in deeper bedrock, suggesting shallow AC holes may miss these zones due to steep dipping.

4. Significance of the Statement on Visible Gold

Statement Analysis

• Visible Gold in MNODH 017: “Very fine specks of visible gold were observed in MNODH 017 in thin quartz veins at 54.85m and 58.3m within oxidised former pyrite.”
  • Significance: Visible gold is a direct indicator of high-grade potential. Even fine specks can correlate with grades >5 g/t in orogenic gold systems, as gold particles often occur with finer, disseminated gold not visible to the naked eye. The presence of oxidised former pyrite suggests a sulfide-rich system, typical of gold deposits in the Eastern Goldfields, where pyrite oxidation releases gold into quartz veins.
• Two Mineralization Styles: MNODH 017 (west) shows a sheeted vein system, while MNODH 018 (east) is breccia-dominated, 70m apart across strike. Faults are associated with higher-grade gold in both.
  • Significance: This dual style suggests a robust mineralizing system with multiple structural controls, increasing the deposit’s potential scale and grade variability. Sheeted veins often host consistent mineralization, while breccia zones can host bonanza grades.
• Application to Relief Shear: “OZM considers that this information can be applied along the entire Relief Shear.”
  • Significance: The geological model (faults, veins, breccia) developed at Cross Fault is likely applicable across the 2.2 km Relief Shear corridor, including the southern sectionals A, B, and C. This boosts confidence in finding similar mineralization 700m south, supporting the RC drilling strategy.

Why the Hotcopper Poster Was Excited @Wack job hehe

• Visible Gold: The mention of visible gold in MNODH 017 is a major positive for investors. It confirms the presence of free gold, often a precursor to high-grade assays, and de-risks the project by proving mineralization at depth.
• Dual Mineralization Styles: The sheeted vein and breccia systems suggest a large, complex deposit with potential for both bulk-tonnage and high-grade zones, appealing to investors looking for upside.
• Relief Shear Potential: The statement’s implication that the Cross Fault model applies to the entire Relief Shear corridor suggests a much larger resource potential than the current 260,000 oz. This could imply a multi-million-ounce system, a significant draw for speculative investors on platforms like Hotcopper.
• Dr. Brett Davis’s Involvement: The continued consultation with Dr. Brett Davis, a renowned structural geologist, adds credibility to OZM’s exploration strategy, reassuring investors that the company is leveraging top expertise to unlock the deposit’s potential.

Summary

• Next Logical RC Drilling:
  1. Beneath MNOAC 843 in Sectional C (6,500N), targeting the porphyry contact and faulted zones at 100–150m depth, with holes spaced 25–50m apart.
  2. East-west drill fences every 100–200m from Sectional C (6,500N) to Sectional A (6,800N), targeting north-south faults, 315°-striking veins, and porphyry units beneath the regolith.
  3. In Sectional A, focus on western sheeted veins and eastern breccia zones to link with Cross Fault.
• Likelihood of a Good Hit at MNOAC 843: High (70–80% chance), due to the surface anomaly, porphyry proximity, and fault association, supported by Cross Fault’s high-grade intercepts.
• Disappearing Gold Markers: Yes, steep eastward-dipping quartz veins likely cause gold markers to disappear in shallow AC drilling, as mineralization plunges deeper than AC holes can reach.
• Significance of Visible Gold Statement: It confirms high-grade potential, highlights a dual-mineralization system, and suggests the Cross Fault model applies across the Relief Shear, exciting investors (like the Hotcopper poster) with the prospect of a larger, high-grade deposit.

Context of the Relief Shear and OZM’s Statement

• Relief Shear Overview: The Relief Shear is a major north-south trending structure within the Norseman-Wiluna Greenstone Belt at Mulgabbie North, northeast of Kalgoorlie, Western Australia. It hosts the 260,000-ounce gold resource (0.7 g/t) and the Cross Fault discovery 1.3 km south, with high-grade intercepts like 48m at 1.66 g/t (MNORC 221). The Relief Shear corridor is known to be 2.2 km long and 150m wide based on 2021 drilling, but the statement implies a broader extent, potentially up to 8 km.
• Cross Fault Insights: Diamond drilling at Cross Fault (MNODH 017 and 018) revealed a sheeted vein system in the west, breccia-dominated mineralization in the east, and visible gold in quartz veins at 54.85m and 58.3m. Faults control higher-grade gold, and the host lithology includes volcanoclastic conglomerate and sandstone, typical of orogenic gold systems.
• Statement Interpretation: OZM’s claim suggests that the geological model from Cross Fault—fault-controlled gold in sheeted veins and breccia zones—can be applied across the entire Relief Shear, implying mineralization potential along its full length, possibly 8 km.

1. Can OZM Say This with Confidence?

Supporting Evidence

• Geological Model Consistency:
  • The Relief Shear is a continuous structural corridor, and orogenic gold systems like those in the Eastern Goldfields often exhibit mineralization over long strike lengths. The Cross Fault’s model (faults, quartz veins, breccia) is typical of such systems, as seen in nearby deposits like Northern Star’s Carosue Dam, which also lies along the Relief Shear trend.
  • The presence of visible gold, high-grade intercepts (e.g., 12m at 4.26 g/t at Cross Fault), and a 400m strike length of mineralization at Cross Fault suggest a robust system. The 2.2 km by 150m mineralized zone identified in 2021 further supports the idea that the Relief Shear hosts widespread gold.
• Exploration Data:
  • Aircore (AC) drilling along the Relief Shear has identified gold anomalies over 2.2 km, with intercepts like 5.02 g/t in 2021 and 4m at 0.57 g/t at MNOAC 843 (700m south of Cross Fault). This indicates mineralization extends beyond Cross Fault.
  • The 2,500m AC program 700m south of Cross Fault, as per the May 7, 2025, announcement, targeted faulting and porphyry units, suggesting OZM believes the structural controls persist southward.
• Structural Continuity:
  • The Relief Shear’s north-south trend and associated faults (e.g., north-south and 315°-striking quartz veins) are consistent features in orogenic gold belts. Cross-faulting offsets stratigraphy by 30m, but doesn’t negate mineralization potential—it creates structural traps that can enhance gold deposition.
  • Dr. Brett Davis’s involvement as a structural geology consultant adds credibility. His expertise in orogenic gold systems likely informed OZM’s interpretation that the Cross Fault model applies more broadly.

Challenges to Confidence

• Limited Drilling Extent:
  • Most drilling has focused on the northern 2.2 km of the Relief Shear (main resource and Cross Fault). The Cross Fault is 1.3 km south of the resource, and the southernmost AC drilling is 700m further south (2 km total). If the Relief Shear is indeed 8 km long, ~6 km remains untested by systematic drilling.
  • Without comprehensive drilling or surface geochemistry across the full 8 km, OZM’s claim relies on extrapolation, which carries risk.
• Structural Complexity:
  • Cross-faulting segments the Relief Shear into 30 structural blocks, offsetting stratigraphy and potentially disrupting mineralization continuity. While faults can host gold, they can also create barren zones if offsets are significant.
• Grade Variability:
  • The main resource averages 0.7 g/t, and Cross Fault has high-grade zones (e.g., 4.26 g/t), but AC results further south (e.g., 0.57 g/t at MNOAC 843) are lower grade. Mineralization may not be economic across the entire 8 km, even if present.
• Regolith and Cover:
  • Much of the Relief Shear is under regolith (20–50m thick), which can mask surface gold signatures. Shallow AC drilling may miss deeper, steeply dipping veins, as noted in your prior question about disappearing gold markers.

Confidence Level

OZM can make this statement with moderate confidence for the northern 2–3 km of the Relief Shear, where drilling and surface data confirm mineralization. However, for the full 8 km, their confidence is speculative and relies on geological extrapolation. The Cross Fault model (faults, veins, breccia) is likely applicable across the shear, as such features are common in orogenic gold systems, but without systematic drilling, OZM cannot definitively claim consistent mineralization over 8 km. Dr. Brett Davis’s input strengthens their interpretation, but more exploration is needed to confirm the extent and grade of mineralization.

2. Does the Interpretation Hold That the Entire 8 km Is Mineralized to Some Degree?

Geological Likelihood

• Orogenic Gold Systems: In the Norseman-Wiluna Greenstone Belt, major shear zones like the Relief Shear often host gold mineralization over long strike lengths. For example:
  • The Kalgoorlie Super Pit (Golden Mile) spans ~5 km along the Boulder-Lefroy Shear Zone.
  • Northern Star’s Carosue Dam, also on the Relief Shear trend, has a 3–4 km mineralized corridor.An 8 km mineralized length for the Relief Shear is geologically plausible, especially given its structural continuity and proximity to other gold systems.
• Structural Controls: The Relief Shear’s north-south faults, 315°-striking veins, and cross-faults create multiple opportunities for gold deposition. Even if cross-faulting offsets mineralization, it can create structural traps, leading to localized high-grade zones.
• Surface and Shallow Evidence:
  • The 2.2 km by 150m mineralized zone (2021) and Cross Fault discovery (400m strike length) cover the northern ~2 km.
  • MNOAC 843 (700m south of Cross Fault) returned 4m at 0.57 g/t, indicating mineralization extends at least 2 km south of the main resource.
  • Surface quartz veining and porphyry units at Cross Fault and further south (e.g., MNOAC 843) suggest fluid pathways and structural controls persist along the shear.

Challenges to the Interpretation

• Untested Length: The southern ~6 km of the 8 km Relief Shear lacks detailed drilling. While AC drilling 700m south of Cross Fault shows promise, there’s no direct evidence of mineralization beyond this point.
• Grade and Continuity: Mineralization may be present but not economic. The main resource averages 0.7 g/t, and southern AC results are lower (0.57 g/t). High-grade zones like Cross Fault may be localized rather than continuous.
• Regolith Masking: Transported cover and regolith could hide surface signatures, making it harder to confirm mineralization without deeper drilling.
• Fault Disruption: Cross-faulting may create barren zones or significantly offset mineralized lenses, reducing continuity.

Interpretation Assessment

The interpretation that the entire 8 km Relief Shear is mineralized to some degree is geologically reasonable but not yet proven. Orogenic gold systems often have low-level background gold (e.g., 0.1–0.5 g/t) along shear zones, with higher-grade zones (e.g., >1 g/t) in structural traps. The Relief Shear likely hosts some gold along its full length, given its scale and structural features, but the grade and continuity are uncertain without further exploration. The northern 2–3 km is well-supported by drilling, but the southern extent relies on extrapolation. I’d estimate a 60–70% likelihood of low-level mineralization across the 8 km, with high-grade zones like Cross Fault being more sporadic.

3. Implications and Next Steps

• Exploration Strategy: OZM’s statement reflects optimism and a strategy to test the Relief Shear’s full extent. The next logical step is systematic AC drilling every 500–1,000m along the remaining 6 km, followed by RC drilling at anomalies. This would confirm if the Cross Fault model applies throughout.
• Investor Perspective: The statement excites investors (e.g., the Hotcopper poster) because an 8 km mineralized corridor could imply a multi-million-ounce potential, significantly larger than the current 260,000 oz. However, this potential is speculative until proven.
• Dr. Brett Davis’s Role: Davis’s expertise in structural geology likely underpins OZM’s confidence. His interpretation of fault controls and vein systems at Cross Fault supports the idea that similar features persist along the Relief Shear, but he’d likely recommend more drilling to validate this.

Summary

OZM can state with moderate confidence that the Cross Fault geological model applies along the Relief Shear, but claiming the entire 8 km is mineralized is speculative without further drilling. The interpretation that the full length is mineralized to some degree is geologically plausible (60–70% likelihood), given the Relief Shear’s scale and orogenic gold system characteristics, but grade and continuity remain uncertain beyond the northern 2–3 km. Systematic exploration is needed to confirm the statement and realize the shear’s full potential.