GB wrote
"Andrew Hawker was sacked for ... suspect share trading by the former MD"
how on earth would YOU know that?
GB also wrote
"What AAM has done in my view is just a blatant mis-representation of facts and an abuse of the JORC just to get at the former MD."
A1 stated they didnt have all the information and data. Please explain how they could have possibly came to same conclusions as JW when they dont have the entire dataset?
my comment - even if there was a missing component of data, this does not explain the massive discrepancy between the quoted grades. Someone is very very wrong and the losers are A1 shareholders.
GB wrote "Andrew Hawker was sacked for ... suspect share trading...
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
