A Consolidation - in itself -- is not a problem --And as the above states -- has to be approved by the Share Holders
And that First consolidation was voted on and passed -- However if all share holders were aware at the time of voting -- that a Second Consolidation was already being discused-- maybe a different result would have happened?.
Where a Possible Investigation could be raised -- is that ALL The Share Holders -- were not informed prior to Voting that another CONSOLIDATION was being discussed and planned by a selected group of Investors .. and depending on What position the Poster has within The Company, should be explored . --- Is the Poster an INNER member of the company -- or just a laborer on site ," while Building out the GAP-" and just happened to overhear some discussions --- or maybe just may be in a relationship with either?
The Callous and contemptuous remarks, that have been posted about Investors , that have lost money --in itself is worthy of an Investigation.
KARMA --
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- CLZ
- Ann: GOLD RESOURCE UPGRADE AT FORRESTANIA GOLD PROJECT
Ann: GOLD RESOURCE UPGRADE AT FORRESTANIA GOLD PROJECT, page-142
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 7 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add CLZ (ASX) to my watchlist
|
|||||
Last
0.1¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $1.439M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.1¢ | 0.1¢ | 0.1¢ | $250 | 250.0K |
Featured News
CLZ (ASX) Chart |