I suspect it's not the actual value of the DSO, or the extra Taxation, but the principal of whether the Mali Government sticks to the contactual terms it's previously agreed for this mine. Regardless of the cost it's a sense of whether Mali Gov. can be a trusted or not. I suspect if they adhere to the agreements, and specifically if no taxes are found to be due on imports etc, perhaps less so the DSO, as that wasn't in the original plans anyway, it's more a matter of interpretation (in the shareholders video call, they stated that they felt DSO should be allowed because it was not specifically mentioned, but I suspect that could go either way. In summary it's down to whether the Mali Gov. stick by what was agreed for existing businesses, as opposed to new businesses which would fall under the new rules for DSO and import taxes etc.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- Ann: Goulamina on Schedule Post Discussions with Mali Government
I suspect it's not the actual value of the DSO, or the extra...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 338 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add LLL (ASX) to my watchlist
|
|||||
Last
50.5¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $605.0M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Featured News
LLL (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable
The Watchlist
LU7
LITHIUM UNIVERSE LIMITED
Alex Hanly, CEO
Alex Hanly
CEO
SPONSORED BY The Market Online