What's everyone's thoughts on one of the positive that the dilution came from JV and not LLL itself? Which is if GF and LLL do find another project elsewhere, the new JV vehicle will be restored back to 50/50? And therefore, the LLL register is not diluted? If that is the real intention on the future of the partnership.
Surely they aren't going to buy new projects in other jurisdictions using the LSMA which Mali also owns?
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- Ann: Goulamina on Schedule Post Discussions with Mali Government
What's everyone's thoughts on one of the positive that the...
- There are more pages in this discussion • 266 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add LLL (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
50.5¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $498.5M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Featured News
LLL (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable
The Watchlist
RDN
RAIDEN RESOURCES LIMITED
Dusko Ljubojevic, MD
Dusko Ljubojevic
MD
SPONSORED BY The Market Online