What I’d like is an honest admission by Leo as to why they (imo) succumbed to GF on a 4-month effective “window” for settlement period for the intended GF strategic placement announced in May, based on the conditions precedent: (a) Chinese regulatory approvals, and (b) executing the cooperation agreement.
I bet we’ll never get to hear why it would presumably take a behemoth like GF four months to end of Sept to get their Govt (to which GF board members are widely known to be affiliated - just Google them) to wave through a paltry AU$106m investment in a strategic resource.
The binding agreement to invest wasn’t so binding after all. Most other binding strategic share placements don’t offer such wide & pushed out exit windows.
We need to add Machiavelli to our reading lists too.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- FFX
- Ann: Government of Mali - Update
Ann: Government of Mali - Update, page-284
- There are more pages in this discussion • 53 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add FFX (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
20.0¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $236.5M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Featured News
FFX (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable
The Watchlist
LPM
LITHIUM PLUS MINERALS LTD.
Simon Kidston, Non-Executive Director
Simon Kidston
Non-Executive Director
Previous Video
Next Video
SPONSORED BY The Market Online