There's no information on those maps as to where the gravity points were measured. So, sure, the contours of 5mgal responses are certainly there, but are they backed up by multiple datapoints, or just one or two? It's all in the subtle details of how these maps were put together. Myself, given the shamozzle thus far, I'll wait for them to actually drill something significant now that it's NW trending epigenetic, vs stratabound copperbelt type mineralisation. The former, as you say, has a donkey's chance, whereas the latter would be interesting.
I'm also skeptical of this attempt to link the NW trending mineralising faults to a Komoa analogue, since there's no evidence yet that the sub-Tapley formations which host the fult-hosted IOCG's are comparable to Copperbelt style mineralisation. I mean, just look at COD for what a real IOCG hematite-copper system looks like, it's not these thin squibby faults.
TAR Price at posting:
4.5¢ Sentiment: None Disclosure: Not Held
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.
(20min delay)