I'm reading the releases correctly. Today's release implies they know the GWC but they have not intersected one at WE (or anywhere else in the Kingia play for that matter).
What they have is an interpreted GWC based on some gas gradients and a water gradient (taken from where??). What is the inferred GWC at WE and how much deeper is this than the saddle between WE and SE? I just think they need to explain that these statements are based on an inferred or interpreted GWC which may have considerable uncertainty given the lack of any intersection in the basin.
I'm reading the releases correctly. Today's release implies they...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 16 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add STX (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
28.0¢ |
Change
0.030(12.0%) |
Mkt cap ! $801.0M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 24.5¢ | 28.3¢ | 24.5¢ | $7.221M | 26.82M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | 293004 | 27.5¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 28.0¢ | 820079 | 16 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 28/06/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| STX (ASX) Chart |