Ann: Greenland Election Outcome, page-51

Exactly, I think they did come out and state there was no shenanigan's, but the market didn't like optics; this was when there was a rumor about the options to purchase the company upon obtaining ML.

An Australian/Chinese ventures need to work twice as hard to make things work. Very tough when operating overseas; and have the board being in Australia, given how contentious the mine is for the last 14 years.

If GGG were like say listed in Europe, and based over there I actually think that the outcome might be different; obviously a different EIA maximising facilities like Finland, as one scenario. Multiple pathway EIA, might have made things with a bit more open discussion. "Oh, the Finns will benefit with more jobs under this scenario pathway and they have dedicated storage facility and high standard'. How can we replicate what they are doing?, Instead of basically a closed discussion on a singular EIA pathway, which doesn't elaborate the risk, and basis for one solution of another.

Literally need a new EIA - or let the market know it being re-worked; should see some more price recovery.