Hi GBB
I don't follow your logic. The EIA was prepared in the days when GGG could assume that they would be allowed to exploit uranium, in addition to REEs.
The double whammy - no exploitation of uranium and no disturbance if >100 ppm - came only this year.
Do you really think the preparation of the EIA should have included information about something that was not applying when they put the EIA together?
Ann: Greenland Government Meeting on Uranium Legislation, page-118
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 124 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
