what a load of rubbish it is a shame to see a great project ruined by poor management.
the way i see and understand the new act is you can not mine anything over 100 ppm uranium and this may be extended to thorium later.
what you cant do is mine it and put it back.
the additional question that also raises would be what would you put it back as, what stable chemical would have to be created etc etc and if it was the existing EIA does not cover that, so perhaps a bit of realism is needed
perhaps gafia who i believe is a chemist has a suggestion
Ann: Greenland Government Meeting on Uranium Legislation, page-55
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 187 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add ETM (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
2.1¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $29.49M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 2.1¢ | 2.1¢ | 2.0¢ | $47.47K | 2.326M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 9 | 3374763 | 1.9¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 2.2¢ | 536181 | 4 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 12/07/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| ETM (ASX) Chart |