That characterisation may be true of burnt holders who make bad...

That characterisation may be true of burnt holders who make bad decisions and then take snide potshots at an otherwise solid company. I see them on quite a few other threads too.

It's entirely your prerogative on how you choose to characterise me. You can hypothesise all you want about my motivations, but I've made them repeatedly clear a long time ago.

If people think my posts are nothing more than snide potshots then they should make good use of the ignore button.



People should worry first about the veracity of what is being said, rather than immediately go to the motivation for saying it.

Truth holds more weight than agenda.