Ann: Hadrian X Dynamic Stabilisation Test Successful, page-28

Most people sound stressed here. I expected that, given some need this to rise, and some are shorting this and will be happy to see it fall, whilst others are looking for a 10c re-entry! I am an engineer, working in a projects execution role, I also understand measurement systems analysis, design of experiments, reproducibility and repeatability etc. To me this is still work in progress. Most of us may never get to know if the seen video represents an improvement, and if it does, what's the improvement magnitude? Playing the devil's advocate, if this is an improvement and is pointing towards realising the goal by Build-1, then no worries. Does team FBR team have the capability to get this to the required precision by Build-1? They are smart fellas, miles ahead of the ordinary folks posting on here, and I trust they will deliver. What FBR are working towards is not a simple task, not a stroll in the park, and even if the brick fell in the video, I wasn't going to be screaming the sky has fallen. They never said this is the final product, unless if I missed something? Patience, holistic view and taking things into context is the key for me.