I've not missed the point I was saying it is ironic that...

I've not missed the point I was saying it is ironic that everyone chops down a reason someone gave as to why ski did not buy in, on the negative side, saying no one could possibly know why. But they all hail someone who says they didn't buy in for a view that fits the narrative better for them.
I know the statement is common practice on a report for explorers but the reason that statement is there (lack of funds, meaning they don't have enough money for continued progress without further raises) seems like a reason as good as the one everyone agreed with.