I think his argument was different though; I understood him to...

I think his argument was different though; I understood him to be saying ISX's $464m claim is ridiculous because no other such claim has been made.

My question goes thus: so if ISX has done their assessment and arrived at $464m in damages, are they going to say, oh wait, no one has ever claimed that, so let's reduce it to $50m because that's the highest that's ever been claimed? What they submit to the court should be based on their own assessment of damages. Of course, the court will also do its own assessment and decide what should be awarded.