But it's true, and it's centrally-relevant.
I realize you don't want to discuss the issue. But ignoring it won't make it go away.
Gold has jumped a lot, and at A$3000, a team of trained monkeys could run Plutonic at a profit.
There is no downside to a 'no' vote. There are 2 possible outcomes: either SGI mines Plutonic at a profit, or CYL adjusts their offer to reflect A$3000 gold price.
Disagree? State your rationale. Or move on, yourself, if you've got nothing to bring to the matter.
Ann: Half year accounts, page-60
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 12 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add CYL (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
$3.37 |
Change
-0.020(0.59%) |
Mkt cap ! $761.5M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| $3.37 | $3.40 | $3.29 | $1.459M | 436.1K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | 3708 | $3.36 |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| $3.38 | 8981 | 13 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 12.10pm 05/11/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| CYL (ASX) Chart |