Apologies, I need to correct myself: the correct prior standard was AASB 118. That standard states that, "Revenue is recognised when it is probable that future economic benefits will flow to the entity and these benefits can be measured reliably." The sponsorship money from FCC that BIG reported as revenues fit this criteria.
Apologies, I need to correct myself: the correct prior standard...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 72 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add BIG (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
$2.22 |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $388.8M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |