they changed the accounting methodology. first page clearly shows comp EBITDA growth of 40%, not 63% as you claim. This is 5% higher than the top end of the guidance, but negated by the diluted EPS number of 3.5cents being in line with estimates.
Also EPS, looks only 3.5cents, that is low numbers, off a low base. Still a lot of work to do.
Market is surely not that stupid to look at accounting changes giving an extra 23% growth rate.
