"Again GD, my observation of observing this forum over possibly 18 months, is that anyone who tries to post something positive, is either tackled or motives questioned, not by one poster but by groups of posters. A few years ago
@pubtrader would not have been questioned at all over requesting a discount. VitaHemp was offering a standard discount for nearly 2 years. It was a valid question."
Let me be very clear, Pubtrader wasnt questioned for the simple act of requesting a discount.
Pubtrader announced their support for the company to pursue legal action against defamation, whilst at the same time stating they would only purchase the companies new products if a discount was offered.
The disconnect here is on one hand a shareholder would encourage the company to spend money to defend its reputation, to the detriment of shareholders funds, whilst at the same time refusing to support the company by purchasing its products unless the company takes a hit to its profit margins at a time when it needs every margin it can get.