ONT's share of DMA was bought for $330k in FY13, they pulled out a $90k dividend this half, then sold it for $400k, so it wasn't exactly an unmitigated disaster (albeit the ~8% return earned on the DMA investment is slightly below ONT's cost of capital). Do you honestly consider it "unexpected" that a company confines to the footnotes only a transaction concerning an asset that's generating <1% of that company's profit? I would've thought that'd be the norm and not the exception.
At a bit more than 11x(f) EBITDA i don't think ONT is quite in my 'buy' zone yet, but it's closer than it has been for a long time. When an owner/operator with a 13 year audited track record of deploying capital at >20% ROICs starts opening the corporate cheque book, i tend to pay attention.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- ONT
- Ann: Half Yearly Report and Accounts
Ann: Half Yearly Report and Accounts, page-9
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 18 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add ONT (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
LU7
LITHIUM UNIVERSE LIMITED
Alex Hanly, CEO
Alex Hanly
CEO
SPONSORED BY The Market Online