Where is the mention of LPD licence @rokkett after such...

Where is the mention of LPD licence @rokkett after such deliberation only yesterday on the topic of the Lmax bonafides....

@sqe, @rayien and myself were 100% on the money with our claims. Acceptance of LPD's tech would have maimed that of SiLeach's viability. The licence is dead and buried and you are left with this piece of GOLD from tonight's HY....about the novel process named SiLeach;

"Lithium Chemicals
LIT has developed a number of lithium extraction processes that, combined with its patented nanotechnology
developed at VSPC, permit the production of battery cathode powders directly from LP, without the
requirement of an intermediate step to produce lithium hydroxide or carbonate. This potentially reduces the
processing steps required to produce cathode materials for LIBs. "RUBBISH"

There is potential for application of LIT’s LieNA® process for the recovery of lithium from fine-spodumene
tailings and off specification concentrates, discharged by concentrate producers. These materials cannot be
used for the production of lithium in conventional “converters” and account for most of the lithium recovery
losses during the production of commercial spodumene concentrates. The LieNA® process thrives on fine and
contaminated spodumene providing an avenue to increase reserves, and improve resource utlisation without
increasing mining costs. "DOESN'T EVEN MAKE SENSE"

LIT is discussing the potential for commercialization of the process with a number of lithium concentrate
producers. Successful commercialisation will improve the utilization and recovery of existing spodumene
processing operations. "WHO, WHERE, WHEN - is simply spin"

LIT has also demonstrated its ability to recycle mine waste (lepidolite) or fine spodumene for battery
production, by virtue of its SiLeach® and LieNA® processes. Two international patent applications were
published by the World Intellectual Property Organisation (‘WIPO’), who administer the filing of international
patent applications, for various aspects of the Company's LP precipitation and refining process. As they are now
in the public domain, the technical details of the patent applications are considered as “prior art” and affords
some protection until they have been granted. "FACT - LEPIDOLITE is NOT SPODUMENE....and filing of patents does NOT constitute protection until the WIPO affords them NOVEL, which they have NOT"

Patent application PCT/AU2019/050540 details LIT’s process for recovering lithium phosphate and lithium
sulfate from a lithium-bearing solution such as brine or pregnant process liquor. This patent protects an
innovation developed during test-work prior to completion of the SiLeach® pilot programme in
August/September 2018. This unit process also has direct application to LieNA® "No it does not, again not protected until considered novel"
.
Page 4
Patent application PCT/AU2019/050541, which incorporates developments from PCT/AU2019/050540 above,
is an enhancement of Lithium Australia’s SiLeach® technology, a process for recovering lithium phosphate and
lithium sulfate from lithium-bearing silicates following the application of a fluoride-accelerated acid leach. " "None of which are protected in Australia or worldwide via any patent whatsoever. SH's beware"

When the announcements from your very own company support the commentary on the company.........OH, the serenity