Ann: Half Yearly Report and Accounts, page-72

So this below is just an opinion poll with input from geos that have not necessarily (and most likely not) stepped foot in the Total/Impact dataroom. I don't give it much credibility but it is interesting to see what other geos thought prior to spud of either Graff-1 and Venus-1X. 118 people counted with Venus COS ranging between 0 and 50%, mean COS 19% , median 15% (is this what you saw perhaps Mr.H?). The 24.2% I saw was from a Company that I "understand" visited the dataroom. It was not the Operator's, nor Impact's estimate, which neither have ever published (as far as I am aware). It is interesting to see that although the mean geological COS determined this group was 19%, 52% of people thought it would be a geological discovery...