Valid points Porter, but to suggest professionals are running the company one could argue the standards are very low imo, perhaps a self untitled title of a "professional" is more likely, not worth its weight in gold at least not today imo. The question who’s the professional in e-commerce, un regulated lending BNPL, private lending, Debt management operations etc that all seem to be under performing ? Which of these businesses are punching above their weight ?
If a brain surgeon had the stats and results like Ci1’s from its last couple years your most likely not using that brain surgeon, agree? if a parachute manufacturer had the same results by the so called professional manufacturers I doubt you’d using the parachute to jump out of a plane agree?. 5 years is long enough to get something right you’d agree or not? The pattern of reports are coming with bad news, always worse then the previous report, why is that? Is that professional or progressive company ?.
Has Jim’s method & board have no basic Logic to identify failures before they fail, generally that qualifies or identifys as a professional and competence. No one likes loose whilst Ci1 imo is in crisis Jim and family earning more money today than the history of ci1 included those offered Options potentially receiving free shares if taking the offer in the near future to the detriment of investors.Shares most likely will get diluted when it’s over 10% of Ci1’s market cap is on offer not the first time options been on offer either not purchased for the obvious reasons. Who in Ci1 is called professional acting in the best interest to of the investors ? or is professional behaviour the bad act of self interests only ? Can’t say or see anything worth while for the investors thus far other than some who speculate that’s nor here nor there.
When pen to paper pros and cons profits and losses, the offering of options and remuneration money est 600% etc seem not to identify a professional act not in a edict, ethical or a morality behaviour. It’s very evident those on HC investors like Cred Xtreme my self and many others who’ve invested not only into Ci1 but Jimmie initially have had the goal post conveniently moved to suit their own selfish needs by which scrutiny is born by their own actions. This is not a phenomena or of a abnormal behaviour by anyones standard, "professionals" need scrutiny and both should be respected, we all get what we want scrutiny will continue to prevail. It means taking accountability and be responsible. Seems some like to down play perhaps condone bad behaviour by the alleged professionals pretend nothing there’s nothing to see here BS, scrutiny is highly unlikely to stop it’s natural in its current nature imo.
For years thus far the leaks seem to get bigger wasting time and money that’s imo running out of both, either they won’t fix the problem or can’t be fix the problem at least thus far that is a problem. The audacity of insults to investors on HC is unacceptable perhaps using the word professional is unwarranted or deserved. Perhaps the comments are regretful but that doesn’t stop the collapse of SP or the companies poor results, going by its competitors standards that are thriving today suggests the CEO & board should be replaced ASAP. Imo or be prepared for the worst.
NOT PROFESSIONAL DYOR
CI1 Price at posting:
18.5¢ Sentiment: Hold Disclosure: Held
(20min delay)