How is ignoring funding initiatives and their purpose, not ‘cherry picking’ Names little. How is ignoring revenues for a premium product also not ‘cherry picking’. Drawing attention to something that is secondary in importance is ‘cherry picking’. Just like Spid’s diversion tactics with his production timelines where circumstances where beyond WKT’s control (port delays), you are deliberately ignoring all the information Names little but still happy to put your biased opinions forward. We are well accustomed to that here.
Ann: Half Yearly Report and Accounts, page-40
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 116 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add WKT (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
11.5¢ |
Change
0.005(4.55%) |
Mkt cap ! $77.19M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 11.3¢ | 11.5¢ | 11.0¢ | $11.92K | 105.3K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | 270182 | 11.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 11.5¢ | 61357 | 3 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 18/06/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| WKT (ASX) Chart |