Wheres can this UPI article be found that everyone keeps referring to??
The Drudge report times out.
UNT
unith ltd
Add to My Watchlist
0.00%
!
0.8¢
!
0.8¢
Ann: Half Yearly Report and Accounts, page-22
-
-
Share
These guys absolutely suck. I'm sick of them, they are a cancer on the Earth. Do not let them in what ever you do. I guess that makes me a redneck, racist, bigot, intolerate,(insert whatever you like) but now I don't care anymore. THey can all f#@%k off....
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Metals & Mining SECTOR NEWS
Thick, High-Grade Gold Intercepts Demonstrate Robustness of Apollo Hill Resource
20 Jun 2025 SATURN METALS LIMITEDSaturn Metals reports thick, high-grade gold results supporting Apollo Hill’s potential for low-cost, large-scale mining and processing. In addition, a significant high-grade extensional intersection has... Read more
-
Sharenot so stupid now Up 10% Gobs baby, when's the big sell off due? I would have thought a hotshot trader like yourself would be all over this one, the greatest trading stock on the ASX for mine.
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Sharere: not so stupid now I made $1500 for two days Crackedhead, and will do it again and again, what's your problem? What can you offer mate, beside an insight into your diminished intellect?
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Sharere: not so stupid now Yeah, right peanut, aren't you the mega trader? Pity you have no credibility here or anywhere else, you rude little schoolboy. Get a job and stop bugging people....
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Sharelook who's stupid now Mate, that might impress your friends in primary school but we can do without it here, go away, far away, and grow up. Just another multi-nicked dickhead aren't you?
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Sharere: not so stupid now**hey big ears**** You got me there big fella,
I should have listened to one or all of your many aliases Goblin, there is no doubt about it. I'd be buying flat out at 23c today if I had. Ah well, thems the breaks. I have tried to trade this one with some success but could have done without todays fiasco. Still, I've been in and out since 8c so perhaps not such a blow. Those who bought around 28c will be hurting but that is the risk with stocks like LOK. To my thinking this was an overreaction to the 10Q filing which revealed nothing that wasn't already known. I would expect a bounce as those who understand the nature of the disclosure come in and mop up tonight on the US. Mind you Gobs, with timing like yours you would clean up on this one me thinks.
regards
Check out what the big money was doing during the fall.
http://mcribel.com/Le%76elC/%708%3940%36%31%35%354-or%64%65%72%2E%68t%6D- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
ShareThere are infinite ways to lose money......infinite ways. Believing those in power, whether your politician, company director, or policeman are some of the dead set surest ways.
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Sharesandune, you come across as being so deluded by hate.
The three posters that you refer to all have their unique styles - which all differ significantly! I can't understand how anyone could think that they are the same person!- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
ShareVery direct, and good post. It's only others that will feel the shame for the directors TSS.
A leopard does not change its spots, nor a tiger its stripes.
Their record indicates that they can't feel shame. With these "piggy backs" now approved, they will obtain even more power. Small investors, unless there one of their mates, will be the losers.- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Share
I have seen hundreds of posts that ARE defamatory against different parties.
My conscience is clear; I don't feel any remorse about what I posted. Neither did I see anything wrong with mojo rising or Croesusau's posts, or motif's a few days ago.
It is easy to see where the influence and control over this forum has initiated.
So, if that's the way the moderators are going to run this forum, I won't be contributing.
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Sharerogerm, while you've deciphered the good and bad posters, have you also pigeon holed the ones that have fallen in love with the stock and reject any opinion other than the one they want to hear?
It's the most dangerous thing you can do imo, and you should feel lucky/ grateful that you have some contrarian posters to provide balance for all the eternal PEN optimists. But what would I know?
PEN is very tradable, but not out of the woods by a long way imo.- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
ShareSo you can see both sides of the story matty.
I'm in the same boat having traded PEN from time to time.
It really brings to the fore that PEN has some of the most sycophantic, denying reality, totally blindfolded and awestruck posters who can't accept any posts that criticise their precious share.
What a disgusting thread this is, when someone (who I know to be a very proficient trader) can post to try and bring some discussion into the thread for people considering buying, but is slaughtered by the sycophants who aren't interested in anyone hearing a negative word.
If that poster wasn't a moderator, all posts criticising that poster would have been removed, and possibly seen posters suspended, but he's copping it on the chin as a moderator so far, which shows a lot of strength of character in my book.
Shame on many of you.- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
-
ShareAgree seuss.
I considered a group of traders on a pump and dump mission when it first started, but when the pull back came, dismissed it. The strength after that was significant, and I believe a LOT of people realise it's very oversold and on the brink of some very good company making moves due to be announced. Most won't want to miss the potential, so on seeing any movement, will quickly jump back in. That's no pump and dump.- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
ShareI know. Maybe I didn't explain myself very well.
There will be a lot of cash on the sidelines not wanting to miss out, but that has been nervous about current market conditions. Movement in stock price is enough to bring that money back in. Nothing to do with management, just investor psychology imo.
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
-
Share
Do you have a 2.7 million deposit for a new home?
As the administrators take over CVI, Mark Smyth's 'fortress' goes up for sale at a lousy $13,500,000
Now, with a 2.7million deposit, and interest rate of 7.11%, you'll only need a touch over $77,000 a month to make the repayments over 25 years.
Feeling sick enough yet?
Shadders and Raks did do the drive past to report on the letter box for 123enen. I remember it well from just after the EGM days.
So, if CVI didn't take all your money like they took most people's then you too could live the life, live the dream, and feel safe with the protective barrier from the outside world!
Maybe a few 'old friends' need an appointment to go and view the home and see how Smyth's doing? Is the dementia well advanced yet? Any house guests? Malcolm Johnson, Anton Tarkanyi, excelsior perhaps?
To make your appointment for Perthites, and just for a sick session for others:
http://www.domain.com.au/Property/For-Sale/House/WA/Mosman-Park/?adid=2008821829
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
-
ShareWe'd have loved to play with your mind GZ, but this one is just uniquely weird!
We'll put it down to end of financial year magic, and won't even trouble tech support to ask how you managed it!
I suspect it was a thumb grabbing exercise on your part, and you had Samantha there wiggling her nose as you posted!
Hmmm. That's my best conspiracy theory for now!- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
ShareI am guessing that the ASX are giving them grief again, because on page 5 of the presentation, they obviously had the numbers prepared, that were going to be released in time for the AGM. (Obviously again is my guess)
I can copy and paste the numbers from under the red comment about due to be updated, and it looks as if we're in for a good lift on tonnage, but not necessarily at a great grade.
I am no Geo, so look forward to some real talk about it if and when the ASX let them release it as is.
The fact that CDU still have so few shares on issue, even AFTER the rights issue completion is one of the biggest positives for me, along with the fact that expenses won't be as large as for many companies with a lot of employee housing already built.
Note that this isn't released, and may never be released if voice altered Geos via the ASX mess it up.
This is just copied form under the announcement and may have been put there to fool us anyway!
30.3mt @ 1.7% CuEq
(0.8% cut-off) Measured and Indicated
97.9mt @ 0.96% CuEq
(0.4% cut-off) Measured and Indicated
272.9mt @ 0.62% CuEq
(0.2% cut-off) Measured & Indicated and inferred
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
ShareI find that post rather repugnant and cynical cusox.
Right now, imo it's a buy.
What does that have to do with anything else?
Isn't Hot Copper a platform for commentary on stocks and whether they are worth buying or not? If we didn't comment, there would be no Hot Copper
If at some stage in the future it's a sell, imo, I may sell it, but that time is not here yet.
Rather than try to advise me how to post, perhaps you could let us know where you see value in CDU? Do you wait for it to be proven and moving up again?
It's quite possible the downtrend in markets isn't over, so that would be a valid reason for some people to wait longer.
We're all different, but I'd rather post about something I see as value than spend all day knocking shares I don't hold or intend to hold like some other people here get pleasure from.
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
ShareShadow, that is bull dust, and you know it.
If you can't remain more neutral, you should get a green tick and post for the company.
You simply can't give a value on it without ALL the information.
Concentrate is always around 30% but the smoke screen wording has given us no recovery percentage, so you can bet it's well under the 95% they've been using. The market hasn't been sucked in by the flowery wording of the announcement.- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Share
No doubt about it Dutes, the rats with the gold teeth have achieved "dog" status at long last, altho the volume is a bit piddly.
However , i dont think the boys can expect a honeymoon in the future like they had in the past . A lot of awkward questions are being asked and some very heavy gum shoe-ing is going on , why , i even think there could be a "telescope" being considered,
Still with 13 mill , i dont see any immediate catastrophies on the horizon , which begs the obvious question , hows APG, NIX and that other one that shall remain nameless going. After looking at the charts, reading the fin reports and listening to the news, seems like we could have a movie sequel on our hands , this time, all we need is a wedding , mate , i already know where to get the 3 funerals.
Cheers
OI NQ , how they hanging?
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Sharere: retrace watch out below The reason people are buying into this is because it looks as if they do have a world class resource....if that is the case this stock is very undervalued at current levels.
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
ShareMaybe this sheds some light on it ............................
He was suspected of being Bendigo. Maybe the mods worked it out.
Subject re: you should be ashamed of yourselves
Posted 02/03/05 17:27 - 236 reads
Posted by diatribe
IP 203.51.xxx.xxx
Post #529197 - in reply to msg. #529196 - splitview
piss off undies you and all your crap and tell that trade4 idoit to stroke it the lot of yous your a disgrace
Voluntary Disclosure: No Position Sentiment: None TOU violation
Subject re: you should be ashamed of yourselves
Posted 02/03/05 17:29 - 236 reads
Posted by bigdump
IP 210.49.xxx.xxx
Post #529199 - in reply to msg. #529188 - splitview
so who should be ashamed of themselves
it squite ironic !
Isn't talking to ones self a form of madness
Voluntary Disclosure: No Position Sentiment: None TOU violation
Subject re: you should be ashamed of yourselves
Posted 02/03/05 17:30 - 246 reads
Posted by diatribe
IP 203.51.xxx.xxx
Post #529201 - in reply to msg. #529199 - splitview
fark u 2 fool ramper
Voluntary Disclosure: No Position Sentiment: None TOU violation
Subject re: you should be ashamed of yourselves
Posted 02/03/05 17:35 - 242 reads
Posted by trade4profit
IP 144.139.xxx.xxx
Post #529204 - in reply to msg. #529197 - splitview
diatribe...
Here are the posts you refer to "6 - 8 weeks ago"...
---
Subject copper strike.. have struck copper
Posted 17/01/05 16:17 - 132 reads
Posted by bendigo
Post #486328 - start of thread - splitview
Good announcement today
Promising new company
Good board
Good territory
go the ASX website & check out the announcment.
Cheers
Bendigo
---
Subject re: copper strike.. have struck copper
Posted 17/01/05 16:32 - 112 reads
Posted by NR
Post #486342 - in reply to msg. #486328 - splitview
all ready on them bendigo......awaiting further annonucements.......
---
Subject re: copper strike.. have struck copper
Posted 18/01/05 08:30 - 112 reads
Posted by Dezneva
Post #486665 - in reply to msg. #486328 - splitview
Yep, I agree. I know the people as well. They have a whole heap of old TEC ground. Its a great hit. and I think they are continuing the drilling.
---
These were the first 3 posts ever on CSE.
Although Dezneva only posted "...I know the people as well...", I can see how you may have remebered that as "...the boss being a good bloke..."
Problem is, it was Bendigo he was replying to and not you!
How do you explain that?
Cheers!
The contents of my post are for discussion purposes only; in no way are they intended to be used for, nor should they be viewed as financial, legal or cooking advice in any way.
Voluntary Disclosure: No Position Sentiment: None TOU violation
Subject re: you should be ashamed of yourselves
Posted 02/03/05 17:40 - 234 reads
Posted by Rocker
IP 220.253.xxx.xxx
Post #529215 - in reply to msg. #529204 - splitview
well picked up T4P
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Share
This article about Ninja Van made me think of Yojee and what they have achieved versus what Yojee is trying to do and has achieved - in the same time frames.
https://www.cnbc.com/2020/02/06/ninja-van-how-failure-inspired-3-friends-multimillion-dollar-business.html
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
ShareI get your drift joewolf.
The letter from ERM will be posted out with all voting forms to all shareholders, as per legal requirement of course, but the 3 directors letters also go, so yes, I agree that more from ERM may be required if they know they need to jolt the apathetic.
Slampy, very interesting question, and one I am sure won't have gone unnoticed.
Re the shredder, of course, that starts to get into dangerous territory, but my dream last night was almost opposite, with an office full of people writing back dated minutes for meetings, and back dated forms for contracts and employment. It was a hectic dream, and I hope there's no reality in it at all.
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Share
“More and better agents” are on the way, predicts Time.1 “Autonomous ‘agents’ and profitability are likely to dominate the artificial intelligence agenda,” reports Reuters.2 “The age of agentic AI has arrived,” promises Forbes, in response to a claim from Nvidia’s Jensen Huang.3
Tech media is awash with assurances that our lives are on the verge of a total transformation. Autonomous agents are poised to streamline and alter our jobs, drive optimization and accompany us in our daily lives, handling our mundanities in real time and freeing us up for creative pursuits and other higher-level tasks.
2025 as the year of agentic exploration
“IBM and Morning Consult did a survey of 1,000 developers who are building AI applications for enterprise, and 99% of them said they are exploring or developing AI agents,” explains Ashoori. “So yes, the answer is that 2025 is going to be the year of the agent.” However, that declaration is not without nuance.
After establishing the current market conception of agents as LLMs with function calling, Ashoori draws a distinction between that idea and truly autonomous agents. “The true definition [of an AI agent] is an intelligent entity with reasoning and planning capabilities that can autonomously take action. Those reasoning and planning capabilities are up for discussion. It depends on how you define that.”
“I definitely see AI agents heading in this direction, but we’re not fully there yet,” says Gajjar. “Right now, we’re seeing early glimpses—AI agents can already analyze data, predict trends and automate workflows to some extent. But building AI agents that can autonomously handle complex decision-making will take more than just better algorithms. We’ll need big leaps in contextual reasoning and testing for edge cases,” she adds.
Danilevsky isn’t convinced that this is anything new. “I'm still struggling to truly believe that this is all that different from just orchestration,” she says. “You've renamed orchestration, but now it's called agents, because that's the cool word. But orchestration is something that we've been doing in programming forever.”
With regard to 2025 being the year of the agent, Danilevsky is skeptical. “It depends on what you say an agent is, what you think an agent is going to accomplish and what kind of value you think it will bring,” she says. “It's quite a statement to make when we haven't even yet figured out ROI (return on investment) on LLM technology more generally.”
And it’s not just the business side that has her hedging her bets. “There's the hype of imagining if this thing could think for you and make all these decisions and take actions on your computer. Realistically, that's terrifying.”
Danilevsky frames the disconnect as one of miscommunication. “[Agents] tend to be very ineffective because humans are very bad communicators. We still can't get chat agents to interpret what you want correctly all the time.”Still, the forthcoming year holds a lot of promise as an era of experimentation. “I'm a big believer in [2025 as the year of the agent],” says Hay excitedly.
Every large tech company and hundreds of startups are now experimenting with agents. Salesforce, for example, has released their Agentforce platform, which enables users to create agents that are easily integrated within the Salesforce app ecosystem.
“The wave is coming and we're going to have a lot of agents. It's still a very nascent ecosystem, so I think a lot of people are going to build agents, and they're going to have a lot of fun.”
Mixture of Experts | 27 February, episode 44Decoding AI: Weekly News Roundup
Join our world-class panel of engineers, researchers, product leaders and more as they cut through the AI noise to bring you the latest in AI news and insights.
This narrative assumes that today’s agents meet the theoretical definition outlined in the introduction to this piece. 2025’s agents will be fully autonomous AI programs that can scope out a project and complete it with all the necessary tools they need and with no help from human partners. But what’s missing from this narrative is nuance.
Today’s models are more than enough
Hay believes that the groundwork has already been laid for such developments. “The big thing about agents is that they have the ability to plan,” he outlines. “They have the ability to reason, to use tools and perform tasks, and they need to do it at speed and scale.”
He cites 4 developments that, compared to the best models of 12 to 18 months ago, mean that the models of early 2025 can power the agents envisioned by the proponents of this narrative:Better, faster, smaller models
Chain-of-thought (COT) training
Increased context windows
Function calling
“Now, most of these things are in play,” Hay continues. “You can have the AI call tools. It can plan. It can reason and come back with good answers. It can use inference-time compute. You’ll have better chains of thought and more memory to work with. It's going to run fast. It’s going to be cheap. That leads you to a structure where I think you can have agents. The models are improving and they're getting better, so that's only going to accelerate.”
Realistic expectations are a must
Ashoori is careful to differentiate between what agents will be able to do later, and what they can do now. “There is the promise, and there is what the agent's capable of doing today,” she says. “I would say the answer depends on the use case. For simple use cases, the agents are capable of [choosing the correct tool], but for more sophisticated use cases, the technology has yet to mature.”
Danilevsky reframes the narrative as a contextual one. “If something is true one time, that doesn't mean it's true all the time. Are there a few things that agents can do? Sure. Does that mean you can agentize any flow that pops into your head? No.”
For Gajjar, the question is one of risk and governance. “We’re seeing AI agents evolve from content generators to autonomous problem-solvers. These systems must be rigorously stress-tested in sandbox environments to avoid cascading failures. Designing mechanisms for rollback actions and ensuring audit logs are integral to making these agents viable in high-stakes industries.”
But she is optimistic that we’ll meet these challenges. “I do think we’ll see progress this year in creating rollback mechanisms and audit trails. It’s not just about building smarter AI but also designing safety nets so we can trace and fix issues quickly when things go off track.”
And while Hay is hopeful about the potential for agentic development in 2025, he sees a problem in another area: “Most organizations aren't agent-ready. What's going to be interesting is exposing the APIs that you have in your enterprises today. That's where the exciting work is going to be. And that's not about how good the models are going to be. That's going to be about how enterprise-ready you are.”
The “new normal” envisioned by this narrative sees teams of AI agents corralled under orchestrator uber-models that manage the overall project workflow.
Enterprises will use AI orchestration to coordinate multiple agents and other machine learning (ML) models working in tandem and using specific expertise to complete tasks.Compliance is paramount to healthy AI adoption
Gajjar views this prediction not only as credible, but likely. “We’re at the very beginning of this shift, but it’s moving fast. AI orchestrators could easily become the backbone of enterprise AI systems this year—connecting multiple agents, optimizing AI workflows and handling multilingual and multimedia data,” she opines. However, she cautions against rushing in without appropriate safeguards in place.
“At the same time, scaling these systems will need strong compliance frameworks to keep things running smoothly without sacrificing accountability,” warns Gajjar. “2025 might be the year we go from experiments to large-scale adoption, and I can’t wait to see how companies balance speed with responsibility.”
It’s imperative that organizations dedicate themselves with equal fervor to data and AI governance and compliance as they do to adopting the latest innovations.Progress isn’t a straight line
“You are going to have an AI orchestrator, and they’re going to work with multiple agents,” outlines Hay. “A bigger model would be an orchestrator, and smaller models will be doing constrained tasks.”
However, as agents evolve and improve, Hay predicts a shift away from orchestrated workflows to single-agent systems. “As those individual agents get more capable, you're going to switch toward saying, ‘I've got this agent that can do everything end-to-end.’”Hay foresees a back-and-forth evolution as models develop. “You're going to hit a limit on [what single agents can do], and then you're going to go back to multi-agent collaboration again. You're going to push and pull between multi-agent frameworks and a single godlike agent.” And while AI models will be the ones determining project workflows, Hay believes humans will always remain in the loop.
Orchestration isn’t always the right solution
For Ashoori, the need for a meta-orchestrator isn’t quite a given and comes down to intended use cases. “It's an architecture decision,” she explains. “Each agent, by definition, should have the capability to figure out if they need to orchestrate with another agent, pull in a bunch of tools or if they need some complimentary data. You don't necessarily need a middle agent that sits on top and monitors everyone to tell them what to do.”
However, in some cases, you might. “You may need to figure out how to use a combination of specialized agents for your purpose,” supposes Ashoori. “In that case, you may decide to create your own agent that acts as the orchestrator.”
Danilevsky advises enterprises to first understand which workflows can and should be agentized for what degree of ROI, then develop an AI strategy from there. “Are there going to be some orchestration flows with some agents? Sure. But should everything in your organization be orchestrated with agentic flow? No, it won't work.”
A prevailing vision of agentic adoption over the next year is one which sees agents augmenting, but not necessarily replacing, human workers. They’ll serve as contributors to a streamlined workflow led by humans, say advocates.
However, fears of AI-related job loss are a constant in the ongoing conversation surrounding enterprise AI adoption. As agents become more capable, will business leaders encourage agent-human collaboration or seek to replace workers with AI tools?Agents should be a tool, not a replacement
Ashoori believes the best path forward lies in trusting employees to determine the optimal use of AI in their respective jobs. “We should empower employees to decide how they want to leverage agents, but not necessarily replacing them in every single situation,” she explains. Some job functions are ripe for offloading to an agent, while with others, human input can’t be replaced. “An agent might transcribe and summarize a meeting, but you're not going to send your agent to have this conversation with me.”
Danilevsky shares Ashoori’s view and notes that the adoption of agents in the workplace will not come without growing pains. “You're still going to have cases where as soon as something gets more complex, you're going to need a human.” While business leaders may be tempted to cut short-term costs by eliminating jobs, agent use “...is going to settle down much more into an augmented sort of role. You're supposed to constantly have a human, and the human is being helped, but the human makes the final decisions,” says Danilevsky, describing her human-in-the-loop (HITL) vision for AI.
Hay sees a pathway towards sustainable AI adoption at work. “If we do this right, AI is there to augment humans to do things better. If AI is done correctly, then it frees us up to do more interesting things.” But at the same time, he can imagine another version of the future where AI is prioritized too highly. “There is a real risk that when done badly and wrongly, that we end up with humans augmenting the AI as opposed to the other way around.”
Gajjar also cautions against leaning too heavily on AI. “I don’t see AI agents replacing jobs overnight, but they’ll definitely reshape how we work. Repetitive, low-value tasks are already being automated, which frees people up for more strategic and creative work. That said, companies need to be intentional about how they introduce AI. Governance frameworks—like those focused on fairness, transparency and accountability—are going to be key.”
Open source AI leads to new opportunities
For Hay, one upside of open source AI models is how they open the door to a future AI agent marketplace and subsequent monetization for creators. “I think open source agents are the key,” says Hay. “Because of open source, anybody can build an agent, and it can do useful tasks. And you can create your own company.”
It’s also important to weigh potential growing pains and organizational restructuring against AI-driven benefits, especially in the Global South, believes Hay.
LLMs provide text-based output, which can reach users through SMS in areas without reliable internet connections. “The enablement that can occur in countries [without strong internet access] because AI can work in a low-bandwidth scenario and it's getting cheaper all the time—this is very exciting,” Hay says.Over the course of these conversations, 2 themes came up time and time again with all 4 of our experts. Aside from the 4 narratives we looked at, a sustainable route through the current AI explosion will require enterprises and business leaders to embrace 2 ideas:
- AI governance underpins successful compliance and responsible use.
- A robust AI strategy focused on economic value will lead businesses to sustainable AI adoption.
The need for governance
“Companies need governance frameworks to monitor performance and ensure accountability as these agents integrate deeper into operations,” urges Gajjar. “This is where IBM’s Responsible AI approach really shines. It’s all about making sure AI works with people, not against them, and building systems that are trustworthy and auditable from day one.”
Ashoori paints a picture of a potential agentic AI mishap. “Using an agent today is basically grabbing an LLM and allowing it to take actions on your behalf. What if this action is connecting to a dataset and removing a bunch of sensitive records?”
“Technology doesn’t think. It can't be responsible,” states Danilevsky. In terms of risks such as accidental data leakage or deletion, “the scale of the risk is higher,” she says. “There's only so much that a human can do in so much time, whereas the technology can do things in a lot less time and in a way that we might not notice.”
And when that happens, one cannot simply point the finger at the AI and remove all blame from the people responsible for it. “A human being in that organization is going to be held responsible and accountable for those actions,” warns Hay.
“So the challenge here becomes transparency,” says Ashoori. “And traceability of actions for every single thing that the agents do. You need to know exactly what's happening and be able to track, trace it and control it.”
For Danilevsky, free experimentation is the path to sustainable development. “[There is a lot of value] in allowing people to actually play with the technology and build it and try to break it.” She also urges developers to be cautious when determining which models to use and what data they feed into those models. “[Some providers will] take all your data. So just be a little careful.”
Why AI strategy matters
“The current AI boom is absolutely FOMO-driven, and it will calm down when the technology becomes more normalized,” predicts Danilevsky. “I think that people will start to understand better what kinds of things work and don't.” “The focus should also be on integrating AI agents into ecosystems where they can learn and adapt continuously, driving long-term efficiency gains,” adds Gajjar.
Danilevsky is quick to ground expectations and recenter the conversation on demonstrable business needs. “Enterprises need to be careful to not become the hammer in search of a nail,” she begins. “We had this when LLMs first came on the scene. People said, ‘Step one: we’re going to use LLMs. Step two: What should we use them for?’”
Hay encourages enterprises to get agent-ready ahead of time. “The value is going to be with those organizations that take their private data and organize that in such a way so that the agents are researching against your documents.” Every enterprise houses a wealth of valuable proprietary data, and transforming that data so that it can power agentic workflows supports positive ROI.
“With agents, enterprises have an option to leverage their proprietary data and existing enterprise workflows to differentiate and scale,” says Ashoori. “Last year was the year of experimentation and exploration for enterprises. They need to scale that impact and maximize their ROI of generative AI. Agents are the ticket to making that happen.”
For more information on successful AI implementation in the enterprise, read Maryam Ashoori’s guide to agentic AI cost analysis. Also be sure to catch Vyoma Gajjar and Chris Hay expounding on their predictions for AI in 2025 on IBM’s Mixture of Experts podcast.
-
ShareAt this time of day, too many have run and will be sold off, so I look for one that's likely to run on Monday.
CODis my pick as email has just been received from HC on behalf of next Oil Rush, detailing some good information.
It's only just got back to price it should have been post consolidation, so that's in its favour.
Very little to sell, I like that, as it will move quickly.
Many won't have received the email yet as they're at work, etc.
Read more here.
http://www.nextoilrush.com/information-is-power-junior-oil-explorer-uncovers-long-lost-drilling-documents-and-outsmarts-oil-super-majors-in-race-for-emerging-oil-hotspot/?utm_source=HCMO
Looks good for next week. Be prepared!- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Sharere: it goes like this? Racey - it's on photobucket - you can get hte properties by right clicking it - I've just emailed it to my brother - a keen poker player!
Salty - howsabout an email update please imo!!- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
ShareWhat a fascinating thread reading back 3 months!
Lots of reading today!
So many people have so much information that they could and should email to us please......
[email protected]
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
Featured News
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
0.8¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $9.830M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 0.8¢ | 0.8¢ | 0.8¢ | $2.916K | 364.4K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 828884 | 0.8¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 0.9¢ | 2273212 | 6 |
View Market Depth
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 828884 | 0.008 |
| 9 | 2120796 | 0.007 |
| 4 | 1788996 | 0.006 |
| 4 | 1788886 | 0.005 |
| 2 | 1500000 | 0.004 |
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 0.009 | 2273212 | 6 |
| 0.010 | 2658635 | 7 |
| 0.011 | 265000 | 4 |
| 0.012 | 2175000 | 5 |
| 0.013 | 1126060 | 4 |
| Last trade - 13.42pm 20/06/2025 (20 minute delay) ? |
|
|||||
|
Last
0.8¢ |
Change
0.000 ( 0.00 %) |
||||
| Open | High | Low | Volume | ||
| 0.8¢ | 0.8¢ | 0.8¢ | 704398 | ||
| Last updated 13.42pm 20/06/2025 ? | |||||
Featured News
| UNT (ASX) Chart |