CRP 0.00% 10.3¢ chatham rock phosphate limited ordinary shares

Ann: HALFYR: CRP: Results for the 6 months to 30 September 2014

  1. lightbulb Created with Sketch. 2
    • Release Date: 27/11/14 11:07
    • Summary: HALFYR: CRP: Results for the 6 months to 30 September 2014
    • Price Sensitive: No
    • Download Document  8.13KB
    					CRP
    27/11/2014 11:07
    HALFYR
    PRICE SENSITIVE
    REL: 1107 HRS Chatham Rock Phosphate Limited
    
    HALFYR: CRP: Results for the 6 months to 30 September 2014
    
    Results for announcement to the market for the 6 months to 30 September 2014
    
    Financial Result
    
    Your directors submit the unaudited financial statements of Chatham Rock
    Phosphate Limited (CRP) for the six months to 30 September 2014. The trading
    result for the period was a loss of $1,870,507 (2013: loss of $675,788). An
    analysis of the result is provided in the table below: (see attachment)
    
    The increased deficit for the six months to 30 September 2014 is mainly due
    to costs related to the AIM listing process that commenced during the period.
    
    Operations Highlights
    
    It's been an incredibly demanding, satisfying and yet at times frustrating
    six months but as we approach the end of 2014, we can look back on having
    achieved some significant milestones. Most satisfying and humbling is the
    continued tangible financial support shareholders have shown for this
    project.  Since August, shareholders have contributed more than $6 million
    towards our goal of a marine consent, bringing the total raised over the past
    four years to more than $33 million.
    
    Naturally, we all hope we will get a great return on our investment as we
    advance this project towards mining; but the feedback from shareholders (both
    in New Zealand and overseas) is they also want this project to succeed for
    New Zealand's agricultural and environmental benefit, and for it to be the
    first successful seabed mining project in the world.
    
    We are all pioneers in a new industry - and your project team's focus is to
    ensure we will continue to be well prepared, well-resourced and expertly
    managed.  The reason we receive such support from both shareholders and our
    many other well-wishers is we have a strong group of leading experts in their
    respective fields, who have designed such a powerful proposition that they
    have made the job of sourcing the necessary funding comparatively easy.
    
    The hearing
    
    We have now (we hope) concluded the 26 days of hearings over seven weeks.
    The Decision-Making Committee will formally close the hearing once they are
    confident they have all the necessary information to make a decision.  Chair
    Neil Walter indicated that the assessment of completeness for the decision
    would largely focus on our comprehensive draft conditions.
    
    We're still hoping for a pre-Christmas decision. Whatever the time frame, the
    latest tranche of money raised - thank you for your enthusiastic support -
    gives us enough to keep the wheels turning in the New Year if we need to wait
    a bit longer.
    
    The Committee will consider four decision options - from a full grant for
    what we applied, to a decline. We told the committee there was ample
    evidence for full approval to mine for up to 35 years across the marine
    consent area. We said the option of trial mining is not financially feasible
    because of how much money we have invested already and the further capital
    involved in building a suitable vessel.
    
    Asked whether an option to grant consent for the smaller, already granted
    mining permit area for 15 years was workable, we said it was not our
    preference, because of future consenting costs and process. We noted that
    this option would involve legal and practical issues such as undertaking
    monitoring in a wider area, and providing for mining exclusion zones.
    
    We've provided shareholders with regular updates on the hearing process,
    including our views about its shortcomings - particularly relating to the
    staff reports. Overall we think the process works, though it is expensive,
    time consuming and has imperfections.
    
    We recognise we are only the second seabed mining application using the new
    Exclusive Economic Zone law, so the process is still being bedded in.  For
    example, we think the Crown played a useful role in our hearing process with
    its submission, but were disappointed - given what it calls its growth agenda
    (including exports) - it did not advance the wider economic impacts of the
    project, and simply focused on conservation issues.
    
    In summary, our key messages are:
    - our proposal involves very limited environmental risks in a small area;
    - it has economic, strategic and environmental benefits;
    - it will not harm any other industry or resource user in New Zealand's
    economy;
    - the few material environmental risks can be managed by conditions;
    - our proposed impacts are miniscule compared with those of fishing, which
    should be taken into account in considering our application;
    - our models are based on significant data, which can and will be further
    validated; and
    - Benthic Protection Areas should be replaced by more refined protected
    areas.
    
    In summary, the project offers new environmental benefits for New Zealand's
    farming industry, by using a low cadmium, low carbon footprint, low run-off,
    potentially organic product. It will create a new industry with strong ties
    to agriculture - New Zealand's most important export earner. CRP's product
    will enhance security of supply and reduce exposure to politically risky
    sources of a critical input to New Zealand's biggest industry.
    
    Financing
    
    While the primary focus of the period under review has been the marine
    consent process, the companion to that has been continuing to finance the
    costs. Consenting is an expensive process - the company's shareholders pay
    for all of the relevant costs of the Environmental Protection Authority, as
    well as our own.  In addition, your money has been invested in a range of
    scientific reports, witness costs and of course the cost of the legal
    guidance we have received.
    
    Our best success in raising capital over the past year has come from ongoing
    strong support from our Kiwi shareholders, plus a small group of overseas
    investors - mainly from the United States and more recently from Britain and
    Australia - complementing the earlier investments from corporate sources such
    as our technical partner Boskalis and from Odyssey Marine.
    
    We've had little success from our two attempts so far at a broader public
    offering.  Perhaps it's arguably too early in the process - certainly most
    institutional investors tell us to "come back when you are permitted", even
    though the share price will likely be much higher when the project is
    "de-risked".  However, local financial markets seem to have far more appetite
    for raising substantial capital for early stage "tech" projects, than a
    proposition such as ours.
    
    Broader financial markets are obviously much less informed than our loyal
    shareholders.  So they are more unnerved when there is bad news.  Our efforts
    for an Initial Public Offering and listing on the London AIM market were
    severely damaged by the negative decision regarding Trans Tasman Resources'
    application for a marine consent.
    
    Our decision to go to the London market was based on considerable enthusiasm
    for our project earlier in the year.  But as most experienced investors know,
    markets run hot and cold - and it doesn't take much sometimes to change
    sentiment.
    
    Thus, we ultimately made the decision our AIM IPO would not fly in 2014,
    though we remain determined to list our shares - given their unique appeal -
    on an international market in 2015.
    
    The future
    
    While the hearing process and financing have been our main areas of focus
    this year, we are also working on a range of other areas. We are talking with
    Boskalis to advance our contract discussions and Najib Moutia continues to
    undertake sales development work through his amazing array of international
    industry contacts.   We're also conducting pot trials of our product to
    validate the positive findings of the extensive testing undertaken in earlier
    years, among other research work.
    
    We remain very confident we have done what it takes to get environmental
    approval for our project.  It's been a bit like a golf tournament: we've done
    the preparation, we've played every shot with care and precision and the ball
    has generally landed where we wanted it.  Ultimately we - including all our
    loyal shareholders - have done everything we can to win the prize.
    
    We can't determine the outcome - but we definitely deserve to win.
    
    Chris Castle
    Managing Director
    
    Robert Goodden
    Chairman
    
    27 November 2014
    End CA:00258188 For:CRP    Type:HALFYR     Time:2014-11-27 11:07:15
    				
 
watchlist Created with Sketch. Add CRP (NZSX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
Last
10.3¢
Change
0.000(0.00%)
Mkt cap ! n/a
Open High Low Value Volume
10.3¢ 10.3¢ 10.3¢ $124 1.206K

Buyers (Bids)

No. Vol. Price($)
0 7 10.1¢
 

Sellers (Offers)

Price($) Vol. No.
10.3¢ 203446 0
Last trade - 12.59pm 23/08/2024 (20 minute delay) ?
CRP (NZSX) Chart
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.