Thanks for the info ddzx, it's interesting that BHP had it in their 1999 report. The fact that it was specifically mentioned is interesting in so far that if it was of 'material interest' to report to share holders.
The fact is that the 2006 anomoly is much larger than the one BHP was targetting Saying that this anomoly could be company maker is a severe under-statement.
IMO
Thanks for the info ddzx, it's interesting that BHP had it in...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 2 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
