@lootgalootAs I remarked a few posts up, 11 and 12 should be 6m...

@lootgaloot

As I remarked a few posts up, 11 and 12 should be 6m apart on the plan but are 750m apart so clearly one or both are wrongly plotted.

"A Public Report concerning a company’s Exploration Targets, Exploration Results, Mineral Resources or Ore Reserves is the responsibility of the company acting through its Board of Directors." Time for the geo-director to do some quality control.

This from Section 19 of JORC 2012 in relation to Exploration Results...

"While it is not necessary to report all assays or drill holes, it is a requirement that sufficient information about the omitted data is provided so that a considered and balanced judgement can be made by the reader of the report. Where reports of Exploration Results do not include all drill holes or all intersections of drill holes the Competent Person must provide an explanation of why this information is not considered relevant or why it has not been provided."

Can you make a considered judgement about the results from Big Jay for instance? The other REE grades might have been useful.

Why weren't all of the results for all of the samples included in the report? It's not as if they're reporting 200 x 40 metre air core holes assayed for 30 metals by the metre. I can't see any explanation in the text or Table 1 for the omission of results.

They were on site for probably three days and collected 13 samples from four locations! They crossed pegmatites on tracks while driving around but didn't sample them. Why not? How about a few channel samples rather than high-grading samarskite with the geiger counter and pXRF.