All of the samples have been assayed for the elements shown below but you've only been given "selected assay results" "for various elements". The crappiest assays remain unpublished. Some of the samples have no results in the announcement.
They've gone back to Cusp to get a couple of sweeteners for the announcement because there's stuff all else.
The two samples from Cusp (11 and 12) are 6m apart but the sample map shows them to be 750m apart.
The samples they take are not of the pegmatite but of the brown stuff in pockets in the pegmatite. You have been given no indication of the likely proportion of brown stuff but I'd bet it is very low.
The copper is a furphy...a narrow zone of green stuff in the schist. Hit it with the pXRF until you get some good reads and then hit it with a geopick.
The 500m long pegmatite from 6 December has 1000ppm yttrium "which is indicative of HRE mineralisation". The samples were assayed for all rare earth minerals so who cares that the yttirum is "indicative"...give us the assays of the other rare earth elements. Yttirum is a low value REE.
How long are you guys going to continue to celebrate a few high grade, pXRF-discovered rock chips? I suppose while the share price continues to rise or hover.
The announcement is very poorly structured and worded which doesn't help. Maybe that's all you can expect from a ten year-old geologist. Let's face it...he's a director of the company but doesn't even rate the title of Competent Person. Mr Biggs continues to fill that role.
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.
(20min delay)