The difference is that slide excludes UHF, which is about 38% of the total asset pool alone and is 100% healthscope. UCW owns a bit under 50% of UHF, and so it accounts for that by only putting the equity value of UHF on its balance sheet (not the debt), and it receives dividends from UHF instead of rent directly. But ultimately that value and dividend stream is all Healthscope rent. And as I mentioned UHF has more debt than UCW, so it is even more exposed to a fall. You can see UHF's assets here Unlisted Healthcare & Life Sciences Fund - HMC Capital
The difference is that slide excludes UHF, which is about 38% of...
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
75.5¢ |
Change
-0.005(0.66%) |
Mkt cap ! $415.3M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 76.0¢ | 77.5¢ | 74.3¢ | $2.013M | 2.666M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | 187957 | 75.5¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 76.0¢ | 11022 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 20/06/2025 (20 minute delay) ? |
| HCW (ASX) Chart |