Exactly! Hence why certain PANR holder and self appointed...

First 104 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
Ralii

2,746 Posts.

207

05/04/24

15:31

Post #: 73209869
Share

Originally posted by Allthatnbagofchips: ↑

88E’s current flow test is from a vertical well, which means flow rates will naturally be lower than what we typically see from horizontal wells, where flow rates can be >1,000 barrels of oil per day…

Horizontal wells have the potential to increase flow rates by ~6-12x.So in theory 88E’s Upper SFS reservoir could potentially flow at ~420 to 840 barrels of oil per day from a horizontal well.

Results sit right in the middle of our base case expectation at 70 BOPD.

The results also sit in line with other vertical wells drilled by 88E’s much larger neighbour Pantheon Resources.…
Pantheon across its three tests produced between 45 and 108 barrels of oil per day...

During the ~4 year period when Pantheon was delivering those flow test results, its market cap was at one point was almost ~A$2BN...

The SMD-B reservoir that Pantheon tested produced a flow rate of ~40 barrels per day, if 88e produced the same or greater volume it would be a better find than Pantheon’s…

So even though 88E has managed to deliver results as strong as Pantheon from a vertical well flow test - its market cap is much less...
(not to mention 88E’s Namibian assets... which are similar to the TSX listed Recon Africa
Right now Pantheon is capped at ~A$524M - whereas 88E is capped at ~A$150M.

Expand

Exactly! Hence why certain PANR holder and self appointed oil&gas expert stopped posting since the ann released.

Results too strong to downplay.

As for the supposed talk of ‘consolidation’, it has no bearing on the outcome of the test flow or sp at least not for the time being.

CR is another point, which is common to all explorers, with such positive results shouldn’t be a deal breaker.

One can buy now at cheap or wait until cr is done and buy at a much higher price.

DYOR

88E Price at posting: 0.7¢ Sentiment: Buy Disclosure: Held
9 Upvote

0 Great analysis

Reply