Sadly that is a sponsored, paid for advertising piece
It takes deception to a new level, omitting the fact the flow rates quoted are peaks, not the actual amounts produced.
A reader would be blindly led down the garden path, thinking 88e had produced these at a sustained rate, which the facts, a 4 barrel production over 16 hours, or 24.8 barrels over XXX refute
Investors would IMO have a legitimate case to sue the writer over such poor research
Ann: Hickory-1 Flow Test - Second Light Oil Discovery, page-76
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 75 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add 88E (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
0.2¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $57.86M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 0.2¢ | 0.2¢ | 0.2¢ | $55.76K | 27.88M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 340 | 940634314 | 0.1¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 0.2¢ | 6254489 | 4 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 07/11/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| 88E (ASX) Chart |