As soon as you start picking out nuggets, black minerals or whatever else the sample becomes bias and represents nothing more than the presence of the minerals assayed for. As soon as a sample has a bias the grade become irrelevant and should not be reported as such. For internal company purposes as a targeting tool then fine, but to report as grade in the highlights of an ASX announcement then I am sorry it just doesn't pass muster for me.
Ann: High grade Niobium results from Equador - Brazil, page-1333
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 159 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add SUM (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
18.5¢ |
Change
-0.015(7.50%) |
Mkt cap ! $13.29M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 20.0¢ | 20.0¢ | 18.0¢ | $319.2K | 1.704M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | 105669 | 18.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 19.0¢ | 79927 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 30/07/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| SUM (ASX) Chart |