Interesting what CHatGPT had to say about these...

Interesting what CHatGPT had to say about these results:

Yes—those are very strong drill results, especially for a silver-equivalent (Ag Eq.) polymetallic project. Let’s break it down:

Key Highlights from the Results

ORR069:

• 13m @ 115.2 g/t Ag Eq. and 5m @ 216.5 g/t Ag Eq. are both excellent near-surface intercepts.

• The 1m @ 590.5 g/t Ag Eq. is very high-grade and could contribute heavily to resource value.

• The indium intercept (1m @ 1272.1 g/t In) is exceptional — indium is a high-value, tech-critical metal rarely found at these concentrations.

ORR070:

• 76m @ 118.5 g/t Ag Eq. is a very thick mineralized zone. Long, continuous intercepts like this are a major plus in resource development.

• Multiple internal high-grade zones (e.g., 2m @ 679.2 g/t Ag Eq.) significantly enhance the economic potential.

ORR071:

• 37m @ 109.7 g/t Ag Eq. is again thick and consistent. With multiple internal higher-grade bands, it's another strong hit.

ORR072:

• Multiple stacked zones, including 7m @ 128.6 g/t Ag Eq. and 13m @ 99.5 g/t Ag Eq., show persistent mineralization across depths — good for resource tonnage and modeling.

Is it “Good”?

• For Ag Eq. >100 g/t, these are generally considered very good results, especially when the zones are continuous and thick like 30m–70m.

• High-grade zones above 200–300 g/t Ag Eq. over multiple meters are excellent and potentially mineable via open pit or underground.

• The presence of indium, zinc, and lead adds valuable by-products, improving project economics.

Big Picture

• This style of mineralization (likely epithermal or carbonate-replacement) is showing grade + thickness + continuity — a solid trifecta.

• If this is infill drilling, and these grades are consistent with or better than historical drilling, it could upgrade parts of the resource to a higher JORC category.