Hi ozblue
The targets are the EM conductors... but that is not to be confused with how deep they might drill. The EM readings only provide a 2 dimensional reflection of the possible high grade mineralisation. It is impossible to know in advance whether the mineralisation is only a few centimetres thick or if it is many metres thick. It has to be drill tested. I am quite confident that once the target has been reached, if it is mineralised, they will continue the hole to the point where it contacts the basal rock.
You are suggesting the company would be wiser to ignore these EM readings and instead drill a wildcat hole 1000 metres deep (which would cost something in the order of $500k by the way).
You are free with your criticism and seem confident in your knowledge of exploration best practice. Do you have any formal qualifications? I would like to know that.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- SGQ
- Ann: High-Impact Drilling at Mt Alexander
Ann: High-Impact Drilling at Mt Alexander, page-48
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 185 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add SGQ (ASX) to my watchlist
|
|||||
Last
3.5¢ |
Change
0.003(9.38%) |
Mkt cap ! $38.09M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
3.3¢ | 3.6¢ | 3.3¢ | $422.9K | 12.23M |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
2 | 2500000 | 3.4¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
3.5¢ | 690283 | 4 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
2 | 2500000 | 0.034 |
7 | 5616596 | 0.033 |
4 | 3775000 | 0.032 |
4 | 3596541 | 0.031 |
6 | 5268541 | 0.030 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.035 | 355539 | 3 |
0.036 | 1912227 | 9 |
0.037 | 2652295 | 3 |
0.038 | 977969 | 4 |
0.039 | 661823 | 3 |
Last trade - 16.10pm 19/08/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
SGQ (ASX) Chart |