E25 0.00% 23.0¢ element 25 limited

I think all the page 5 financial summary numbers relate to the...

  1. 2,715 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 5848
    I think all the page 5 financial summary numbers relate to the 130kt production variant. The $1,188/t figure referenced is the 130kt average cost and the at full production is used twice, but then again on the next page to reference 130ktpa.

    I think the Maths at that stage when at full 130kt production may be approx:
    • $2,550 * 130kt = $331.5m of revenue.
    • $154.42m of production costs (130kt @ $1,188)
    • $178m of EBITDA (using $2,550/t gets within $1m to the published figure)
    • Throwing these numbers, some capex and lower production in the first few years gets values close to the NPV quoted.

    The original scoping study at 50kt was $1,950*50+$900*16.6=$112.4 less $38.2m costs and $1.3m of unknown rounding for $73m cashflow. Costs and Capex have gone up significantly but they are now likely to be a lot more accurate for an operation operating in the US.

    Also, while the OEM's will obviously try to push down every input cost, $2.55/kg IRA HPMSM HPMSM isn't going to create the same concerns for them as $50-$80/kg Lithium Hydroxide or $35/t cobalt. Synthetic graphite is also in the $8/kg range so manganese would remain a cheaper battery input material.
 
watchlist Created with Sketch. Add E25 (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
Last
23.0¢
Change
0.000(0.00%)
Mkt cap ! $50.03M
Open High Low Value Volume
0.0¢ 0.0¢ 0.0¢ $0 0

Buyers (Bids)

No. Vol. Price($)
1 10036 23.0¢
 

Sellers (Offers)

Price($) Vol. No.
17.5¢ 392 1
View Market Depth
Last trade - 09.43am 25/06/2024 (20 minute delay) ?
E25 (ASX) Chart
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.