Ann: Hydrocarbon gas recovered & evaluation program forward plan, page-817

isn’t it simply that the water sample liberated some gas when it was blown down? That’s how I read it.

Announcement states: recovery of natural gas from a primarily water bearing interval…

What I am more mystified by, is why don’t we have any other information regarding the logging (ex. sampling) operation? They haven’t shared anything other than ~900m gross of hydrocarbon bearing intervals which we already knew from the MK1 shambolic logging exercise and here they are 2 wells later and most precious funds spent and not a dot of additional information shared starting to feel like MK2 has been squandered as bad as MK1 that’s why market reacting so poorly. Why not share some information on results? Must be poor that will be the assumption in the absence of transparency.