You are wrong again bomber YOu have “assumed* the consultants...

You are wrong again bomber

YOu have “assumed* the consultants were to quote you “having a go at the EPA”
Do you seriously think a professional WA environmental consultancy group
would go to the EPA and put them offside?

Then in YOUR post re the lady from the EPA who phoned you,
you mention quite clearly the lady told you she has been “engaging with Prestons”

So the evidence contradicts you own assumption that they were offended by Prestons.

Furthermore:
While I don’t have any way of knowing for sure,
I can assume that Bruce would have far more regular conversation/contact
with the EPA than you.

So if he conveyed his feelings to shareholders, based these conversations,
he must have thought approvals were imminent.

I dont know Bruce
Apart from a meeting him at a presentation he did in Melbourne many years ago
when I spoke to him briefly, I had not spoken to him before that meeting,
nor have I spoken to him since.

Like I keep repeating.

The Board is working for ALL shareholders.
Including you.

We are all frustrated by the delays.

But for you to keep denigrating Bruce
and trying to undermine him is not helpful.