What is this? The language looks like a walking back of the...

What is this? The language looks like a walking back of the language used in the original announcement. The title is “clarification” but it’s not very clear to me and the statement doesn’t say what exactly it is clarifying.

What are they saying now? - the project has not been completed as previously stated? i.e. only up to “milestone 4” with “milestone 5” still to be done?

And this announcement says nothing about commercial and technical feasibility like the first one did (nor does it reconfirm). Rather it simply confirms “suitability”. Has this statement been forced out by an ASX query to explain today’s odd price action here? It’s pretty poor form to put out a clarification without stating bluntly what is being clarified.