domum, thanks for those links.
In the icewine #1 report they note a significant conventional target in the Kuparuk interval. Any idea why there is no mention of this and apparently no testing of this target with icewine #2?
From the IW#1 final drilling update:
"In addition to the unconventional HRZ play, a number of conventional reservoir targets were tested by the drilling of the Icewine#1 well with the following key highlights:
o Excellent reservoir was encountered over the Kuparuk sands interval from 11,262’ – 11,320’ with elevated gas readings over a 58 foot gross interval
o Preliminary log interpretation of the Kuparuk sand interval indicates porosities of up to 15% and good permeability
o The reservoir quality in this Kuparuk sand interval is substantially higher than anticipated, which is extremely positive for deeper conventional prospectivity on the Project Icewine acreage
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- 88E
- Ann: Icewine 2 Drilling Update - Total Depth Reached
Ann: Icewine 2 Drilling Update - Total Depth Reached, page-42
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 38 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add 88E (ASX) to my watchlist
|
|||||
Last
0.2¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $57.86M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.2¢ | 0.3¢ | 0.2¢ | $2.871K | 1.430M |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
237 | 229711066 | 0.2¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.3¢ | 542559084 | 199 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
223 | 220759782 | 0.002 |
190 | 790653848 | 0.001 |
0 | 0 | 0.000 |
0 | 0 | 0.000 |
0 | 0 | 0.000 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.003 | 517009081 | 188 |
0.004 | 299147458 | 111 |
0.005 | 50047471 | 52 |
0.006 | 31219656 | 30 |
0.007 | 22482965 | 20 |
Last trade - 16.10pm 09/08/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
88E (ASX) Chart |