If the reported 90% failure rate of the batteries are true, then you really have to ask, why they haven't picked this up in the 7 plus years the company did, in testing and analysis???
Surely, the people who did the evaluation of the batteries would have picked it up?
Given the situation now, I highly doubt any company or white knight will come in, with extra money (on top of $100m to pay off existing lender) to fix the plant and batteries.
It would be putting good money to chase after bad investment.
The issue now is whether the collapse of IM3NY will collapse MNS (as you correctly pointed out), from loan guarantees?!?
The other issue is, when did they take control of IM3NY (1st Dec or 6th Dec)?
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- Ann: iM3NY Credit Facility Update
If the reported 90% failure rate of the batteries are true, then...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 129 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add MNS (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
4.2¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $50.37M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Featured News
MNS (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable
The Watchlist
CCO
THE CALMER CO INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
Anthony Noble, CEO
Anthony Noble
CEO
SPONSORED BY The Market Online