Ann: Impairment of Moomba Sydney Ethane Pipeline, page-46

I am trying to talk about the facts here and address specific items raised. Can you address the specific points rather than making general hand wavy comments like "my arguments are weak" and "do some research"? It doesn't appear you have read the articles/blog posts you have shared or understand the implications of what they say."

@Winniethepoo,

I believe I see your problem: you have a desire to be shown a factually-supported, substantive basis for things.

Seemingly, what you need to adopt instead when it comes to investing in APA, is more of a broad-brushed "vibey" feel. You need to allow the exciting hydrogen aura wash over you.

Sort of, investment-by-ideation-and-feelings, if you like.
Or, re-imagining what isn't, but what might be at some distant point in the future.

Stir fry an idea in your conceptual thought wok and see what sizzles.

Those kinds of things.

But directing the debate to specifics and facts, as you are?

Nah, those are the stuff of "weak argument" and the "need to do some research".

.