Share
257 Posts.
lightbulb Created with Sketch. 94
clock Created with Sketch. 18/08/23
12:36
Share
Originally posted by really stupid:
↑
I have been in this stock since it was 1c and the one constant has been destructive capital raises at times when the share price looked like moving up (and I think it was setting up for that last week). From 1c to 60c and now back to 8c. I've been a believer all the way - but I do hate these capital raises. It's like Management charts the SP and says: "right, the share price is set to run. kill that and dilute the stock base for some added fun". In terms of the license acquisition, I get how the IP is complementary to IMU's current stuff: if our virus can get targeted expression of CD19 and this licensed tech targets CD19, we have a nice match and great potential. I also get the more advanced stage and the add-on of the lab lease. However, unlike some of the key prior acquisitions, this one has not involved the target taking a position in IMU (unless I missed that). I see that as a significant red flag. I get that there are arguments to the contrary - but money does talk and the level and timing of this cap raise and the nature of the consideration for the acquisition screams that I should not be as confident in IMU's pipeline as I (probably still) am. that would have been great news. Personally, I think the deal that was done is not a great one. I also cannot see how the proposed $3m gift/finders fee is legal, but I guess someone has looked into that.
Expand
" I also cannot see how the proposed $3m gift/finders fee is legal, but I guess someone has looked into that."
