HamishM, As you have been in IMU for " 8 figures for over 9...

HamishM,
As you have been in IMU for " 8 figures for over 9 years". If you read the middle part of my post- I suggested retail investors were at long odds of being able to change Senior management at the AGM. If your 8 figures ( collectively within your family entities ) is correct, I'd imagine if you spent over $10,000,000.- 9 years ago (assuming the first denomination starts with a one ) that you would no doubt be a top 20 holder. You might be one of the many unhappy investors here, that might have an input, as you are not a retail investor- Sophisticated, no doubt.

What interest's me in the suggested replacement of Senior Management- Just who do you propose takes the wheel of the ship ?
I agree, management (not the scientists) should answer some hard questions in the AGM. After so long in waiting for a result, why would you want any division or instability. Given the late hour of your long investment and heaps of pending results and news, wouldn't a - PLEASE EXPLAIN- be better as a warning shot across their bow.

I'm not happy with the communications and marketing over the past three years in IMU management. However, I still see everything coming together. That mixed with the huge potential (in my opinion) to be a 100+ bagger- The last thing I want is any instability. I'd prefer to see management sorted out for now.

Hope we can all be patient for a little longer !

Go IMU!

Not Financial Advice- Opinions Only- DYOR!