Does this mean they have known for a while that infill drilling (i.e. a larger proven resource) was necessary to be able to achieve financing? There always seemed to be too much unnecessary drilling expenditure while money was tight. Hate to sound like a consipracy theorist, but that would explain alot with respect to what we haven't been told with respect to realistic time frames and unexpected capital raisings over the last couple of years.
Does this mean they have known for a while that infill drilling...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 34 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add AAU (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
0.4¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $3.986M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 0.4¢ | 0.4¢ | 0.4¢ | $24.74K | 6.185M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 18 | 29581090 | 0.3¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 0.4¢ | 4029364 | 4 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 19/06/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| AAU (ASX) Chart |